Z
ZML88
Member
i have been closely following results on this forum and others of temporary SMPs. however, while the results are convincing, the assertion that the pigments fade over time is less so. i have seen dozens and dozens of patients' results immediately after their procedure, but no documentation of how the SMP looks after a lengthy period of time.
it seems absurd to me that there is so little evidence of how tricopigmentation pigments fade given that this is no longer a new procedure, and the main selling point of it is that it fades! there must be hundreds of men out there with whom this could have been documented. so why is this so difficult to find?
furthermore, most of the discourse on tricopigmentation is from those within the industry. there is a distinct lack of testimonials from patients who have had the procedure done. i know if i did, i would make sure to let all of you know how it was going
i really want to believe that this is the real deal, as it seems like the perfect procedure for me. but i cant trust it yet. please prove me wrong and send some pictures or links detailing how any given patient's tricopigmentation has faded. any help is much appreciated
it seems absurd to me that there is so little evidence of how tricopigmentation pigments fade given that this is no longer a new procedure, and the main selling point of it is that it fades! there must be hundreds of men out there with whom this could have been documented. so why is this so difficult to find?
furthermore, most of the discourse on tricopigmentation is from those within the industry. there is a distinct lack of testimonials from patients who have had the procedure done. i know if i did, i would make sure to let all of you know how it was going
i really want to believe that this is the real deal, as it seems like the perfect procedure for me. but i cant trust it yet. please prove me wrong and send some pictures or links detailing how any given patient's tricopigmentation has faded. any help is much appreciated
Last edited: