W
Walkers
member
Hello I am New to this forum and I hope I am posting this in the right area.
So my story.
I had 2000 graphs(fue) inserted into the front of my head September 2018. This was with dr tetiana mamontova though a company in the UK called ukhair. Unfortunately this procedure was not a success. And after 2 year's of reviews. I finally was told they would retreat me as they agreed my results were not very good.
I had my second fue hair transplant with dr tetiana mamontova in Feb 21(1000 graphs). This was also a failure. I contacted ukhair and dr tetiana mamontova and complained about the results. I sent in pictures of my failed hair surgery and They replied that they would like me to have blood tests to rule out any underlying medical issues that could contribute to the failed hair transplants. I did this and it all came back normal. I have no issues that would contribute to the failed hair transplants.
I then arrange to have a consultation with Dr Ragu Reddy in his surgery in Harley Street London. I wanted a second opinion as I feel that my surgery is pretty bad.
He looked at my hair and in his opinion it's not good. It's not the worst he has seen but it's not a good transplant. My donor area has been very aggressively harvested. They have gone extremely high on my donor area, causing my scalp to be very visible. Some of the graph's have been inserted at the wrong angles in the recipient area. Also they have used up 80-90% of my donor hair. So on the whole not great.
I have recently been for a review of my hair and situation with one of the consultants(Paul) at ukhair Harley Street London. I made it clear
That I had been for a second opinion and i explained what Dr Reddy had told me with regards to my hair surgery. Paul agreed that my surgery wasn't a complete success. He felt that there's still some growth left in my hair(although I'm certainly not convinced). He said I have 50% hair to scalp coverage on the recipient area.
He then offered me 2 options.
Option 1. A third hair transplant
Option 2. Scalp Micro pigmentation under my frontal area to hide the low density of my hair surgeries. Also he wants to see me in 7 months to see if I have any more growth.
Firstly there is no way I would let ukhair touch my hair again after 2 failed surgeries. I just don't know where to go with this now?
Should I be demanding my money back? As I've been advised by a very reputable hair surgeon to exactly that?
Now I have researched scalp micro pigmentation
And it's normally used for people with shaved heads right? Also it has to be redone every 3-6 year's. That's a big expense.
Also ukhair guarantee their work. So should I be looking for them to refund me my money? As they have had 2 goes at my hair with minimal results. I feel like my life is on hold as I can't be me like this.
The pictures I have attached are my results after surgery number 2.
So my story.
I had 2000 graphs(fue) inserted into the front of my head September 2018. This was with dr tetiana mamontova though a company in the UK called ukhair. Unfortunately this procedure was not a success. And after 2 year's of reviews. I finally was told they would retreat me as they agreed my results were not very good.
I had my second fue hair transplant with dr tetiana mamontova in Feb 21(1000 graphs). This was also a failure. I contacted ukhair and dr tetiana mamontova and complained about the results. I sent in pictures of my failed hair surgery and They replied that they would like me to have blood tests to rule out any underlying medical issues that could contribute to the failed hair transplants. I did this and it all came back normal. I have no issues that would contribute to the failed hair transplants.
I then arrange to have a consultation with Dr Ragu Reddy in his surgery in Harley Street London. I wanted a second opinion as I feel that my surgery is pretty bad.
He looked at my hair and in his opinion it's not good. It's not the worst he has seen but it's not a good transplant. My donor area has been very aggressively harvested. They have gone extremely high on my donor area, causing my scalp to be very visible. Some of the graph's have been inserted at the wrong angles in the recipient area. Also they have used up 80-90% of my donor hair. So on the whole not great.
I have recently been for a review of my hair and situation with one of the consultants(Paul) at ukhair Harley Street London. I made it clear
That I had been for a second opinion and i explained what Dr Reddy had told me with regards to my hair surgery. Paul agreed that my surgery wasn't a complete success. He felt that there's still some growth left in my hair(although I'm certainly not convinced). He said I have 50% hair to scalp coverage on the recipient area.
He then offered me 2 options.
Option 1. A third hair transplant
Option 2. Scalp Micro pigmentation under my frontal area to hide the low density of my hair surgeries. Also he wants to see me in 7 months to see if I have any more growth.
Firstly there is no way I would let ukhair touch my hair again after 2 failed surgeries. I just don't know where to go with this now?
Should I be demanding my money back? As I've been advised by a very reputable hair surgeon to exactly that?
Now I have researched scalp micro pigmentation
And it's normally used for people with shaved heads right? Also it has to be redone every 3-6 year's. That's a big expense.
Also ukhair guarantee their work. So should I be looking for them to refund me my money? As they have had 2 goes at my hair with minimal results. I feel like my life is on hold as I can't be me like this.
The pictures I have attached are my results after surgery number 2.