Artas Robotic marketing!

[Ismell]

Artas Robotics claiming the robot is better at extracting grafts than a manual punch! Is this true?

 

[Bigmac]

Inconsistent results will be produced by any Fue device in the wrong hands.

 

[Ismell]

It appears Artas are claiming the robot can go faster, therefor it's more efficient. I don't believe this to be true.
Can a manual fue clinic please comment on this?

 

[JoeTillman]

No, it is claiming the robot can process an image and the information it represents quicker.

 

[Ismell]

Artas picture still claiming its better than manual Fue for accuracy, the picture shows Artas hitting the spot every time, with manual missing. What it does not show is; Artas going in at wrong angle dissecting grafts, punching too deep, leaving grafts buried. This i have been advised by a Fue doctor.

 

[JoeTillman]

These are not problems limited to the ARTAS. Manual and motorized extraction can have this problem too. I don't think you should be concentrating on what the ARTAS can or cannot do. Concentrate on finding a clinic that has consistency of results to back up what they say. If the results are from ARTAS then so be it.



Words are useless, results are your guide and the patients that have them on their heads. Try to meet patients and see their results with your own eyes.


You're in Turkey where there is not a single ARTAS robot available so why are you even asking? Which clinic(s) have you spoken with?

 

[Ismell]

Dr. Fotios Tsounis In Greece I considered for Artas Fue. I consider dr Ekran Dermirsoy and dr Ilker in Turkey. I look at Artas site with bad fut scar implying this is what happens with fut. This scar happen in only small numbers.

 

[Ismell]

I could say this picture is donor from fue implying all fue give this including robot. Robot site is not clear with its description.