bullitnut
4 awesome repairs with SMG
This is scary stuff, but an interestig article.[/b]
[/b]
Johnson & Johnson makes damning revelation[/b]
If you ve wondered what s causing a bad spell of hair loss, perhaps you might want to look at what s in your shampoo. While a shampoo is meant to nurture hair follicles, promote growth, rinse of dirt and leave a layer of protective oil, some of the chemicals are so carcinogenic, that manufactures spew billions on advertising and marketing to ensure the secret ingredients stay safe.
This past week, Johnson & Johnson the baby-goods behemoth made a startling revelation and a swift remedy. Johnson & Johnson made headlines citing that they are reformulating their popular brand of baby shampoo, because babies don t need Formaldehyde in their baths!
The ingredient which they ve now rinsed it off the original product had been there for many years. The company made the revelation to the New York Times only when they were finished with the new formula which is expected to appear on store shelves worldwide soon.
The new improved version removes two potentially harmful chemicals formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane from the big bottle of yellow suds. This is in response to pressure from consumers and activist groups, when Johnson & Johnson promised back in 2011 to phase out the chemicals in question by the end of 2013. The company has not only come up with a new formula for their famous baby shampoo, but also for roughly 100 other baby-care products in their lineup.
Both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane have been coming under fire in recent years for their links to cancer. Neither existed in its pure form as an ingredient in Johnson & Johnson products and may not even be present in local brands of baby shampoo.
Common preservatives that were used on Johnson & Johnson products, however, have been known to release formaldehyde over time. And a process used to make other ingredients mild (no more tears!) can create 1,4-dioxane. Johnson & Johnson also plans to remove the chemicals from their other product lines, like Neutrogena, by 2015.
If consumers where to scrutinize the labels of the many local shampoos that are available in the supermarket, one is sure to find at least one carcinogenic chemicals if not many.
While it s not easy to remember each and every toxic chemicals, more so when scanning the particular isle at a supermarket, if you do it once you are sure to find a brand or type of shampoo with the least amount of chemicals, it would be advisable to use it continuously.
[/b]
Johnson & Johnson makes damning revelation[/b]
If you ve wondered what s causing a bad spell of hair loss, perhaps you might want to look at what s in your shampoo. While a shampoo is meant to nurture hair follicles, promote growth, rinse of dirt and leave a layer of protective oil, some of the chemicals are so carcinogenic, that manufactures spew billions on advertising and marketing to ensure the secret ingredients stay safe.
This past week, Johnson & Johnson the baby-goods behemoth made a startling revelation and a swift remedy. Johnson & Johnson made headlines citing that they are reformulating their popular brand of baby shampoo, because babies don t need Formaldehyde in their baths!
The ingredient which they ve now rinsed it off the original product had been there for many years. The company made the revelation to the New York Times only when they were finished with the new formula which is expected to appear on store shelves worldwide soon.
The new improved version removes two potentially harmful chemicals formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane from the big bottle of yellow suds. This is in response to pressure from consumers and activist groups, when Johnson & Johnson promised back in 2011 to phase out the chemicals in question by the end of 2013. The company has not only come up with a new formula for their famous baby shampoo, but also for roughly 100 other baby-care products in their lineup.
Both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane have been coming under fire in recent years for their links to cancer. Neither existed in its pure form as an ingredient in Johnson & Johnson products and may not even be present in local brands of baby shampoo.
Common preservatives that were used on Johnson & Johnson products, however, have been known to release formaldehyde over time. And a process used to make other ingredients mild (no more tears!) can create 1,4-dioxane. Johnson & Johnson also plans to remove the chemicals from their other product lines, like Neutrogena, by 2015.
If consumers where to scrutinize the labels of the many local shampoos that are available in the supermarket, one is sure to find at least one carcinogenic chemicals if not many.
While it s not easy to remember each and every toxic chemicals, more so when scanning the particular isle at a supermarket, if you do it once you are sure to find a brand or type of shampoo with the least amount of chemicals, it would be advisable to use it continuously.






