• Welcome to Hair loss Experiences hair loss forum.

    Free impartial hair loss advice, hair transplant advice, hair loss medications and hair loss news.
    You can contact us directly at [email protected] if you experience any problems.

Hair loss and depression

topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
He is citing a report. Do you even understand the difference?

People I speak to realize that these medications have completely screwed up their systems and they are becoming more aware of the fraud behind it. Does this mean everyone is awake €¦ €¦ €¦ €¦..no so in that sense you are correct. I €™m basing it on my own experience and what I see and misread those numbers maybe hoping good was gaining a foothold and I did say I think people are waking up, yes we have a long way to go to awaken most.


I could easily say the same thing about hair transplantation. Everyone I speak too seems to be awake to the reality of what is really going on but I suppose the bigger picture would be very different. Yes I believe people are waking up but in reality the majority will be sucked in by an industry top heavy with too many very bad players who wear a mask. The only time the mask is removed is when a patient decides to comment publicly on what has happened to them but the majority just remain silent €¦ €¦ €¦silent in their shame.

What is interesting about the mask is that patient can easily see when the mask is removed but one must dig deep into the history of patients that have in fact posted their displeasure on the forums. Most simply fail to dig into that history even though I constantly make a point of it €™s importance. Only then with the mask removed is the truth revealed for everyone to see and then the thread is slowly bumped down away from sight. But once one sees the actions and words upon it's removal they always remember it. Seems kind of shocking at first but it is useful as it tempers one's taste for rushing into anything.


I have never had depression and when I have been down in the past I bounce back in a few days. My thinking is different and after I read up on cognitive therapy I realized the techniques were the same ones I used naturally. I have read up on the subject as it relevant to what I am writing and yes I do need to read much more.

 
Last edited:
JoeTillman

JoeTillman

Valued member
topccat29 wrote:
He is citing a report. Do you even understand the difference?

People I speak to realize that these medications have completely screwed up their systems and they are becoming more aware of the fraud behind it. Does this mean everyone is awake €¦ €¦ €¦ €¦..no so in that sense you are correct. I €™m basing it on my own experience and what I see and misread those numbers maybe hoping good was gaining a foothold and I did say I think people are waking up, yes we have a long way to go to awaken most.


I could easily say the same thing about hair transplantation. Everyone I speak too seems to be awake to the reality of what is really going on but I suppose the bigger picture would be very different. Yes I believe people are waking up but in reality the majority will be sucked in by an industry top heavy with too many very bad players who wear a mask. The only time the mask is removed is when a patient decides to comment publicly on what has happened to them but the majority just remain silent €¦ €¦ €¦silent in their shame.

What is interesting about the mask is that patient can easily see when the mask is removed but one must dig deep into the history of patients that have in fact posted their displeasure on the forums. Most simply fail to dig into that history even though I constantly make a point of it €™s importance. Only then with the mask removed is the truth revealed for everyone to see and then the thread is slowly bumped down away from sight. But once one sees the actions and words upon it's removal they always remember it. Seems kind of shocking at first but it is useful as it tempers one's taste for rushing into anything.
Yes, I do know the difference and yes, he is citing a report. The reports are only part of the equation which I'll get to in a moment. But first, let's look at the commentary he included.

Many people will write this off as a result of long hours, or the stress of the job, but it is also possible that many of these doctors are experiencing severe guilt for participating in a medical industry that actually does very little to help people.

This is his commentary, his OPINION, and he has absolutely ZERO qualifications to make such assumptions. This is the same guy that is defending the existence of a super secret online bazar (that means "marketplace") for illegal drug trafficking. I mistakenly said arms sales but apparently that was only temporary through a sister website BUT I'm admitting my mistake, voluntarily no less, but I digress. Guys like this make their living spreading conivance theories. He promotes anarchy for crying out loud.

On to the actual report...

To suggest, much less read and BELIEVE, that the reason why successful doctor suicides is higher than the rest of the population is due to the guilt of not actually helping people is a downward vertical stretch of human intelligence and decency. If you look up the author of the report that Mr. John G. Vibes, rave concert promoter, references you'll see that Dr. Wibble is talking about doctor suicide being from the intense pressures that medical students endure in med school. As she states, it is a culture that rewards self-neglect. She seems like a delightful lady and John G. Vibes is a dirtbag for twisting her point. Just a few days ago she sent expert witness testimony to the Missouri medical board.

copy and paste the link...
https://youtu.be/4nfy8Hwj5Oc

Learn more about Dr. Wibble at this parasitic link.. http://www.idealmedicalcare.org/

So here we are yet again, Topcat. You are reading dribble written by disheveled anarchists and taking it as a valid point of reference. You ask me if I know what it means for someone to cite a report. Yes, I do. Do you know what it means to READ a report instead of repeating soundbites from an anarchist, rave concert promoter, that can't afford a comb? Are these the kind of people you rely on for information? This is pathetic.


I have never had depression and when I have been down in the past I bounce back in a few days.

And this is why, with all due respect, you should shut your pie hole. You have NO idea what you are talking about. Seeking medical attention is the FIRST thing that anyone should do and not doing so, and trying to self-treat mental health, is why the doctor suicide rate is higher than the regular professional population. If you actually knew anything about Dr. Wibble, the inspiration for the rave concert promotor's article, you'd know that.
 
Last edited:
topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
I have read plenty and seen enough to understand very well how the medical system is set up. Is is all bad............no............but unfortunately much bad can be found same as with the ht industry. Just the way it is and once one understands this then they approach with caution.

Yes they do and should seek medical advice if there is no other choice but they must do their best to avoid the evil that lurks.
 
Last edited:
JoeTillman

JoeTillman

Valued member
Yes they do and should seek medical advice if there is no other choice but they must do their best to avoid the evil that lurks.
Who is "they" and what is it that "they" do? Huh?

Seek medical advice if there is no other choice? What is wrong with you? How about the opposite? Get some help and then decide if what you are told makes sense. Or, I don't know, look up the side effects of any medications that are prescribed.

You quoted Steve Jobs in another thread earlier and I think this is telling of your approach to life. Steve Jobs was a big believer in holistic medicine and alternative treatments. Walter Isaacson, his biographer, revealed that they had many conversations about Job's approach to his pancreatic cancer and he wanted the world to know that he regretted waiting so long to actually do anything conventional. His pancreatic cancer was discovered in 2003. For years he avoided conventional treatments. We all know how it ended 8 years later and truly regretted his naivety.

You too have a similar approach and you have a disdain for doctors that has prevented you from seeing one for 30 years. Live your life the way you want to but preach this to others is reckless and dangerous. You have a specific diet and you have a foundation to base your beliefs but you know as well as I do that the vast majority of people do NOT have such a specific diet so they have no such foundation in which justify following your anti-doctor mantra. This makes your recommendations in this regard grossly irresponsible.








 
Last edited:
topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
The last good book I read on the subject was "Mad In America" (Whitaker) if you Google it you can find their website with plenty of blog contributions from several in the actual field.

Reading books is great. If you are feeling just a little bit down give it try. Helps in having to figure out who is out to help you and who is out to just take your money and possibly cause you harm. Often books can be a valuable source for information leading to the right professionals. Books really are great with the knowledge you can you can tell if the advice you are receiving from a doctor makes sense or if maybe you would be better off looking for someone else.

Here is one of the recent blog postings. He is not a mentor it's an actual professor :) Do you think the mental health industry has mentors...............hmmmm................I wonder.............that would be funny a mental health mentor..............lol........but hey you never know anything is possible in this world............absolutely anything. I wonder is a mentor a higher rank than an actual doctor. Maybe............maybe we should all seek out a mentor after receiving medical advice from an actual doctor who is highly skilled. We can go to the mentor and see what he has to say..............I mean it is free and a mentor is like a doctor...........right?

In fact we can pass a new law. Whenever we consult with a professional such as a doctor, lawyer, CPA etc we are also required to consult a mentor. A lower level employee who has been around a bit. Maybe set up a mentor test like the Bar Exam. Once you pass it you get your mentor license.

Interpersonal Effects By Professor John Read
Foreign Correspondent April 7, 2015
Not long back in Melbourne after the ISPS conference in New York City. As a longstanding member of the ISPS Exec and editor of ISPS €™s scientific journal €˜Psychosis €™ I am obviously biased, but it was pretty cool to be among 750 kindred spirits for five days. Have a look at the two thoughtful reviews of the conference by MIA writers Noel Hunter and Sandra Steingard €“ and then consider joining us in ISPS. Ok; advertising over!

​
Rather than write about my usual main focus of psychosis, I thought it timely to talk a bit about depression and antidepressants. My undergrad lectures on depression start with €˜This will be a short lecture. Depression is caused by depressing things happening €“ end of story. €™ Of course I go on to talk about the various factors that make one person only a bit depressed and another very depressed after the same depressing thing has happened. (Including, of course, the number of other depressing things that have happened prior to the latest depressing thing).


I try to get across the basic idea that there is not something called €˜depression €™ or €˜major depressive disorder €™ or €˜depressive illness €™ inside people that causes them to feel depressed €“ the mistake that so many mental health professionals, encouraged by big pharma reps, seem to make. My favourite example of this silliness is research showing that suicide is caused by something called depression and that therefore the way to reduce suicide rates is to identify and treat (with drugs of course) people with this thing €“ rather than identifying depressing things and doing something about them.


Anyway, I thought I would make a small contribution to the discussion about how coverage of the recent airline tragedy focuses so much on the supposed €˜mental illness €™ of the pilot and not so much on the possible role of antidepressants. Of course we will never know the answer to these questions but it is important, I think, to combat the simplistic nonsense wheeled out after most such tragedies, the nonsense that says the person had an illness that made them do awful things.


So, just to confirm what many recipients of antidepressants, clinicians and researchers have been saying for a long time, especially the prolific David Healy, here are some findings from our recent New Zealand survey of over 1,800 people taking anti-depressants,[sup]1[/sup] which we think is the largest survey to date.


Eight of the 20 adverse effects studied were reported by over half the participants; most frequently Sexual Difficulties (62%) and Feeling Emotionally Numb (60%). Percentages for other effects included: Feeling Not Like Myself - 52%, Agitation 47%, Reduction In Positive Feelings - 42%, Caring Less About Others - 39%, Suicidality - 39%, and Feeling Aggressive - 28%. If one had to imagine a combination of feelings most likely to increase the chances of a tragedy involving the loss of multiple lives it would be hard to do better than emotional numbing, agitation, aggression, suicidality and caring less about others.


Although we cannot know whether these findings are relevant to the recent tragedy it certainly seems that antidepressants do have a broad array of adverse emotional and interpersonal effects and that these effects are far more common than previously thought. Of course an online survey runs the risk of attracting people with an axe to grind €“ but 82% of the respondents also thought that the medication had reduced their depression.


Given that recent reviews have found that these drugs are no more effective than placebo for the majority of recipients, we also tried to enhance our understanding of the placebo effect by investigated which psycho-social variables were related to whether respondents thought the drugs had worked.[sup]2[/sup] We found that perceived effectiveness was significantly related to a range of non-pharmacological variables, including: the quality of the relationship with the prescriber, being fully informed about anti-depressants by the prescriber, holding fewer social causal beliefs about depression, not having lost a loved one in the two months prior to prescription, and - somewhat paradoxically perhaps - belief in €˜chemical €™ rather than €˜placebo €™ effects.


It is worth mentioning that even a group of people who had accepted a biological treatment for their difficulties and had (mostly) found it helpful, did not unquestioningly swallow the €˜chemical imbalance €™ theory of depression (and everything else) espoused by biological psychiatry and the drug industry.[sup]3[/sup] The most strongly endorsed causes were: Family stress (90.8% €˜agreed €™ or €˜strongly agreed €™), Relationship problems (89.9%), Loss of loved one (87.5%), Financial problems (86.9%, Isolation (86.3%), and Abuse or neglect in childhood (85.4%), with Chemical imbalance (84.8%) coming in 7[sup]th[/sup], Heredity 12[sup]th[/sup], and Disorder of the brain 13[sup]th[/sup].


Finally, we gave participants ten possible reasons that prescription rates of antidepressants are so high (in 2013 the number of prescriptions in England - 53 million - surpassed the total population - 52.6 million). Among the more commonly endorsed explanations were: €˜Drug companies have successfully marketed their drugs €™ (61%), €˜Drug companies have successfully promoted a medical illness view of depression €™ (57%), €˜GPs don €™t have enough time to talk with patients €™ (59%), and €˜Other types of treatments are not funded or are too expensive €™ (56%). The least endorsed explanation for high prescribing rates was €˜Anti-depressants are the best treatment €˜ (20%).
* * * * * References:


1. Read, J., Cartwright, C., Gibson, K. (2014). Adverse emotional and interpersonal effects reported by 1,829 New Zealanders while taking antidepressants. Psychiatry Research 216, 67-73
2. Read, J., Gibson, K., Cartwright, C., Shiels, C., Dowrick, C., Gabbay, M. (2015). The non-pharmacological correlates of self-reported efficacy of antidepressants. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. doi: 10.1111/acps.12390
3. Read, J., Cartwright, C., Gibson, K., Shiels, C., Haslam, N. (2014). Beliefs of people taking antidepressants about causes of depression and reasons for increased prescribing rates. Journal of Affective Disorders, 168, 236-242.
Professor John ReadJohn Read is on the Executive Committee of ISPS, and editor of its scientific journal €˜Psychosis. €™ In 2015, Dr Read took up the post of Professor of Clinical Psychology at Swinburne University of Techonology in Melbourne. His books include: Models of Madness: Psychological, Social and Biological Approaches to Psychosis, Experiencing Psychosis: Personal and Professional Perspectives, A Straight Talking Introduction to the Causes of Mental Health Problems, and Making Sense of Madness: Contesting the Meaning of Schizophrenia.
This entry was posted in Adult, Antidepressants, Blogs, Causation Theories, Childhood Adversity/Trauma, Depression, Disorders, Featured Blogs, Foreign Correspondents, Issues, Psychiatric Drugs, Suicide, Trauma/Distress, Violence and tagged antidepressant, antidepressants, Germanwings, mass killings, placebo, psychiatric medication by Professor John Read. Bookmark the permalink.
 
Last edited:
JoeTillman

JoeTillman

Valued member
Here is one of the recent blog postings. He is not a mentor it's an actual professor :) Do you think the mental health industry has mentors...............hmmmm................I wonder.............that would be funny a mental health mentor..............lol........but hey you never know anything is possible in this world............absolutely anything. I wonder is a mentor a higher rank than an actual doctor. Maybe............maybe we should all seek out a mentor after receiving medical advice from an actual doctor who is highly skilled. We can go to the mentor and see what he has to say..............I mean it is free and a mentor is like a doctor...........right? In fact we can pass a new law. Whenever we consult with a professional such as a doctor, lawyer, CPA etc we are also required to consult a mentor. A lower level employee who has been around a bit. Maybe set up a mentor test like the Bar Exam. Once you pass it you get your mentor license.

More condescending attitude. I'm actually sorry that you feel you have to resort to such tactics but if you must to make yourself feel better and to try and deflect the fact that you don't know what you're talking about, then so be it. You are doing exactly what I said you'd do and you are still a liar and of course, as shown in the quote above, a bully. This hasn't changed and all you can do is mock me.
You quote rave concert promoters as if they are a valid resource and when I bust you on this and show that what the rave concert promoting anarchist says is wrong and then show the original source with the original context you can't even address it and you have to move on to another lie or, at best, misinterpretation. Do you see the pattern here? You keep quoting others to back up your points and you can't even get that part right. You are quoting rave concert promoting anarchists. You are misreading statistical data regarding total pharmaceutical medication sales (you could not even get the country right). You quote website rankings from a specific source, Alexa.com, but you don't know how to read simple reverse order rankings which leads you to interpret the data in a way that would have Google ranked as the least visited website in the world. You are quoting dead celebrities that would be alive if they didn't follow the same ideals that you are currently promoting. When does it end? When will you simply debate without being a bully and a liar? When will you stop relying on the work of others to make your point? You know, when will you stop being an intellectual...parasite?
The excerpt from the book you provided is great. But it is irrelevant and you misinterpreted the point. Again. I don't believe anyone here said that anti-depressants are great across the board so there has been no debate in this regard. It's just that you can't walk away from a debate until you get the last word and the problem with that is, well, your word is usually wrong.
If a family member has cancer many will give the advice of going to the oncologist where they receive the standard treatment which often ends in needless suffering and death with life being prolonged for a few years. Maybe the better choice would have been one of the many alternative treatments that have excellent track records. In order to do to that though one must take personal responsibility for whatever happens which most will not do. Having the responsibility of someone €™s very life is more than most will take on. Much better to take responsibility by sending the person to what is considered orthodox regardless of the outcome. One then takes responsibility without taking on complete responsibility as the person was given the best they had to offer.
Don't you think Steve Jobs's wife should be held responsible for his death? According to Jobs's biographer, she was one of the people in his circle that strongly encouraged him to avoid conventional treatments and to embrace alternative treatments. Don't you think he had access to the absolute best that alternative medicine had to offer? He spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on such treatments. Like I said, you are free to avoid the doctor for as long as you want but I personally do not think you have the right to preach this approach, especially to the young naive patients that you claim to care so much about. They are young and they are impressionable and while they are the perfect audience for you (easily manipulated) they are also your responsibility if they get sick or injured. Regardless, you and everyone here can argue about this till we're all blue in the face. It won't change the fact that you are a liar and a bully.











 
topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
You expect the patient to decide whether he is receiving good advice from the doctor after the fact yet you expect the same patient not to be in a position to read a book because he might be too depressed. The same person very well could be drawing from very little knowledge or experience knowing what to look for €¦ €¦ €¦ €¦ €¦..doesn €™t sound like there is much logic to your advice.

Yes you encourage the patient to consult a doctor €¦ €¦ €¦.. a professional. Yet you feel very comfortable offering your own services not being a doctor. Maybe they would be better off leaving you out of the equation and just consult multiple doctors.


Now see if there was a really good book that was open and honest they could read it and have something to work from. I guess you don't get it. My message is not anti hair transplant. If my head was untouched I would have a hair transplant today even knowing everything I know. But of course I know what to look for and understand the bad is just as important as understanding the good.


People should be entitled to all the information when making a medical decision........it's
important.


I can take your abuse I'm not crying about it........... they are only words coming from someone with something to protect. I don't fault you for it. In real life chances are it would be a little different and it's the same for guys who get razzed about hair loss. It can only happen when others think they are safe and can get away with it. I'm the same in person I state my opinion on what I believe is true.

I have had some of your patients in my home when you were with H&W yes very true. I thought the work was great and I did my best to convince them of this as I understand hair transplants and what one can achieve. Younger guys might have expectations that are simply too high. Posting that I always stated that H&W was absolutely number 1 in North America when it comes to strip is easy for me because it is what I have stated nothing different so I never have to worry about someone saying I stated something different. Do I like robotics...............sorry no doesn't take away from their work..............do I like tattooing, no..........once again their strip work is absolutely top notch.

I'm not sure why you left but usually it comes down to money as you seemed very happy. Money is not everything I think if you do enough good, things will go your way.

I had a patient recently ask me in an e-mail if he was annoying me as I was a bit rude in my response. This is exactly why.................this is a ruthless industry no different then many others...........not all bad but plenty of bad behind the scenes as the war for patients goes on, it's serious business. Patients simply need to understand this so that they can take the necessary time to acquire the necessary information to make a better decision.


What I have learned in life is that there are bad people out there that don't care too much. Being nice is simply not enough and one but be able to protect themselves from those people. So yes learn to protect yourself from these people. Somehow you see that differently. Most guys that are suffering from hairloss need to maybe just learn to not be so accommodating or worried about what others think then choosing a hair transplant might not even become an issue because it is no longer necessary.



 
Last edited:
JoeTillman

JoeTillman

Valued member
topccat29 wrote:
You expect the patient to decide whether he is receiving good advice from the doctor after the fact yet you expect the same patient not to be in a position to read a book because he might be too depressed. The same person very well could be drawing from very little knowledge or experience knowing what to look for €¦ €¦ €¦ €¦ €¦..doesn €™t sound like there is much logic to your advice.

Yes you encourage the patient to consult a doctor €¦ €¦ €¦.. a professional. Yet you feel very comfortable offering your own services not being a doctor. Maybe they would be better off leaving you out of the equation and just consult multiple doctors.


Now see if there was a really good book that was open and honest they could read it and have something to work from. I guess you don't get it. My message is not anti hair transplant. If my head was untouched I would have a hair transplant today even knowing everything I know. But of course I know what to look for and understand the bad is just as important as understanding the good.


People should be entitled to all the information when making a medical decision........it's
important.


I can take your abuse I'm not crying about it........... they are only words coming from someone with something to protect. I don't fault you for it. In real life chances are it would be a little different and it's the same for guys who get razzed about hair loss. It can only happen when others think they are safe and can get away with it. I'm the same in person I state my opinion on what I believe is true.

I have had some of your patients in my home when you were with H&W yes very true. I thought the work was great and I did my best to convince them of this as I understand hair transplants and what one can achieve. Younger guys might have expectations that are simply too high. Posting that I always stated that H&W was absolutely number 1 in North America when it comes to strip is easy for me because it is what I have stated nothing different so I never have to worry about someone saying I stated something different. Do I like robotics...............sorry no doesn't take away from their work..............do I like tattooing, no..........once again their strip work is absolutely top notch.

I'm not sure why you left but usually it comes down to money as you seemed very happy. Money is not everything I think if you do enough good, things will go your way.

I had a patient recently ask me in an e-mail if he was annoying me as I was a bit rude in my response. This is exactly why.................this is a ruthless industry no different then many others...........not all bad but plenty of bad behind the scenes as the war for patients goes on, it's serious business. Patients simply need to understand this so that they can take the necessary time to acquire the necessary information to make a better decision.


What I have learned in life is that there are bad people out there that don't care too much. Being nice is simply not enough and one but be able to protect themselves from those people. So yes learn to protect yourself from these people. Somehow you see that differently. Most guys that are suffering from hairloss need to maybe just learn to not be so accommodating or worried about what others think then choosing a hair transplant might not even become an issue because it is no longer necessary.
The transition is now complete. In your last post you were very condescending and now you resort to chest thumping and veiled physical threats. This is the bully side of you reacting to not being able to express yourself properly. Having "my" patients in your home, telling us about how you are such a good guy, trying to cast doubts about the motivations behind my activities over the past year, and sharing anecdotes about emails you get; it's all irrelevant and has nothing to do with the fact that what you are preaching is dangerous. It is your opinion that people should avoid doctors unless it is a last resort. That is fine for you, but if you are going to defend this position for others, try to come up with something that is consistent.
Your message at first was very clear...
I often see many on the forums recommending those who are suffering any type of hair loss depression to consult a professional. Of course this seems like the responsible thing to do while also putting one in a position of not having to take any personal responsibility which is how many systems are set up. Refer to the professionals and this makes it a closed system which is much more profitable but not always best.

This indicates you are making an accusation of collusion. That there is a specific reason why one would make this type of recommendation. You are talking about the forums so I'd like to know what else one is supposed to do when conversing on a forum. Should they travel to one's home and sit down to help figure out what the problem is or should they just not say anything at all? It is my opinion that when one says on a forum, get professional help, they mean get some professional help. I highly doubt the people that say this are trying to contribute to the "closed system".
You then backtracked when Janna and Bullitnut challenged your position and you said, to to make it more clear no less, that one should "do a modest amount of research.". You avoided her questions as well. She was asking about your reference to forum posters not taking responsibility for comments of support they may make. Yet you replied to her question with points about how if one does not contribute to this "closed system" that you described they could lose their medical license. You never answered who you were talking about except to say you can't name names. You said "posters" yet you are talking about people losing their medical license for not contributing to the closed system. It makes no sense.
After quoting rave concert promoting anarchists and misreading pharmaceutical statistics that contradicts your point about public awareness you have to resort to veiled physical threats. It is predictable but unfortunate.

In real life chances are it would be a little different and it's the same for guys who get razzed about hair loss. It can only happen when others think they are safe and can get away with it. I'm the same in person I state my opinion on what I believe is true.

"Real life" or on the forums, physical violence doesn't change the core of the problem. You are a bully, you lie and you have to rely on the soundbites of others to make your point and you don't even understand the soundbites to begin with.

I'm done with this thread unless you wish to continue trying to smear my name. I've made my point abundantly clear. One thing I can absolutely guarantee. You may say the same thing on the forums that you would say in "real life" but if your name and face were attached to what you say on the forums you would act much differently. You would not be a bully and you would not try to spread rumor and innuendo to damage the good names of others. It is easy when you can hide. I'm not hiding and my opinion is seen by everyone, along with my face and my full name. And I'll remind you, I'm not "abusing" you so stop playing the victim. You started this when you said I was responsible for ruining the lives of young men by not rocking the boat and when you called me a parasite. Never forget that.


 
Last edited:
topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
Yes I do let my anger get the better of me with this whole hair transplantation issue. It €™s not only because of my own personal experience of being led astray when simply asking for help but by constantly hearing the same happen to others. I should worry less about feeling anger for them and move toward the positive so simply an emotional reaction on my part which is better left restrained while concentrating on how to help.


I do apologize to the forum and both Janna and Bulinut for coming on too strongly. I tend to see so much mirrored in this mental health ssue but obviously many are being helped. I will leave my personal feelings to myself and try to focus on the positive as I am often advised to do.

The parasite comment was absolutely unnecessary and uncalled for on my part and for and that I also sincerely apologize to you Joe. It was a very low blow on my part. It was done without thinking but still very low for me. This whole HT issue has had a huge impact on my life as well as others including yourself. For me both positive and negative and I will do my best to let go of the negative.
 
JoeTillman

JoeTillman

Valued member
topccat29 wrote:
Yes I do let my anger get the better of me with this whole hair transplantation issue. It €™s not only because of my own personal experience of being led astray when simply asking for help but by constantly hearing the same happen to others. I should worry less about feeling anger for them and move toward the positive so simply an emotional reaction on my part which is better left restrained while concentrating on how to help.


I do apologize to the forum and both Janna and Bulinut for coming on too strongly. I tend to see so much mirrored in this mental health ssue but obviously many are being helped. I will leave my personal feelings to myself and try to focus on the positive as I am often advised to do.

The parasite comment was absolutely unnecessary and uncalled for on my part and for and that I also sincerely apologize to you Joe. It was a very low blow on my part. It was done without thinking but still very low for me. This whole HT issue has had a huge impact on my life as well as others including yourself. For me both positive and negative and I will do my best to let go of the negative.
Fair enough, Topcat. Apology accepted and thank you for stepping up.
 
topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
Yes sarajhee the more information one has the better off they will be when making decisions. If one does not have time to read a book maybe read an abstract but the importance of having as much information as possible is extremely important in my opinion. Otherwise we are just listening to those that are marketing which is not necessarily bad but too often important facts are left out. This is the problem when money enters the equation it seems to skew advice in favor of the marketer and less so for the consumer.

Abstract
The purposeful application of fermentation in food and beverage preparation, as a means to provide palatability, nutritional value, preservative, and medicinal properties, is an ancient practice. Fermented foods and beverages continue to make a significant contribution to the overall patterns of traditional dietary practices. As our knowledge of the human microbiome increases, including its connection to mental health (for example, anxiety and depression), it is becoming increasingly clear that there are untold connections between our resident microbes and many aspects of physiology. Of relevance to this research are new findings concerning the ways in which fermentation alters dietary items pre-consumption, and in turn, the ways in which fermentation-enriched chemicals (for example, lactoferrin, bioactive peptides) and newly formed phytochemicals (for example, unique flavonoids) may act upon our own intestinal microbiota profile. Here, we argue that the consumption of fermented foods may be particularly relevant to the emerging research linking traditional dietary practices and positive mental health. The extent to which traditional dietary items may mitigate inflammation and oxidative stress may be controlled, at least to some degree, by microbiota. It is our contention that properly controlled fermentation may often amplify the specific nutrient and phytochemical content of foods, the ultimate value of which may associated with mental health; furthermore, we also argue that the microbes (for example, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria species) associated with fermented foods may also influence brain health via direct and indirect pathways.

Go to:
Introduction
€˜The processes required for fermented foods were present on earth when man appeared on the scene €¦ When we study these foods, we are in fact studying the most intimate relationships between man, microbe and foods. €™ [1]

Prof. Keith H. Steinkraus, Cornell University, 1993

As highlighted in the quotation, our Paleolithic ancestors had plenty of opportunity for the consumption of food products (for example, honey, fruits or berries, and their juices) that had been unknowingly subjected to natural microbial fermentation. Without knowledge of microbes, our ancestors recognized, over time, the palatability, preservative, analgesic, and mentally stimulating or sedating qualities of fermented foods and beverages [2]. Thus, the stage was set for the purposeful application of fermentation to provide value in the areas of human nutrition, traditional medicine, and culture (ceremonies, and so on) [3,4]. It is difficult to say with certainty when intentional fermentation began in earnest; however, sophisticated measurements of the chemical content within ancient Neolithic vessels suggest intentional fermentation of fruit, rice, or honey beverages has been in common practice for close to 10,000 years [5]. As agriculture expanded, so too did intentional fermentation techniques. Beyond the clear references to alcohol production, it is now obvious that household and artisanal fermentation of cereals, dairy, vegetables, fish, seafood and meats were a significant part of ancestral dietary practices [6].

Modern advances in chemical preservation, refrigeration, and transportation efficiency have not resulted in the abandonment of fermented foods. At least in traditional dietary practices, fermented foods and beverages remain widespread, currently accounting for approximately one-third of the human diet globally [7]. Moreover, as scientists continue to uncover health-promoting properties of ancestral dietary patterns (for example, the Mediterranean diet, the traditional Japanese diet, and hunter-gatherer diets), by extension there is a renewed examination of the fermented foods that are so often a part of such ancient diets [8]. Emerging research, as reviewed here, indicates that fermentation may magnify the known benefits of a wide variety of foods and herbs, influencing the bioavailability and activity of the chemical constituents. In addition, as our knowledge of the human microbiome increases (the intestinal microbiota in particular), it is becoming increasingly clear that there are untold connections between the ways in which microbes act upon dietary items pre-consumption, and in turn, the ways in which these fermented dietary items influence our own microbiota.

Here, we review and synthesize various lines of investigation related to fermented foods, intestinal microbiota, and mental outlook. We argue that the consumption of fermented foods may be particularly relevant to the emerging research linking traditional dietary practices and positive mental health. It is our contention that fermentation may amplify the specific nutrient or phytonutrient content of foods, the ultimate value of which is associated with mental health; furthermore, we also argue that the microbes associated with fermented foods may also influence brain health via direct and indirect pathways.

Go to:
Traditional diets and mental health

The shift away from traditional lifestyles has been linked to increased rates of depression and other mental health disorders [9-11]. Among the variables that might afford protective or resiliency effects against mental health disorders (depression in particular), diet has emerged as at least one strong candidate [12]. Superficially, it would seem obvious, given the brain €™s dependence upon nutrients for its structure and function (including the micronutrients and non-nutrient dietary antioxidants, for example polyphenols, that run the antioxidant defense system) that nutrition should be a target of research in mental health. Remarkably, this area of research, now known as nutritional psychiatry, is one that has been historically neglected or the subject of poorly designed studies. However, there have been tremendous strides in recent years and the research connecting mental health and nutrition has become increasingly robust. Indeed, a recent 5-year prospective study (n?=?23,020) has shown that unhealthy maternal and early postnatal dietary patterns (for example, processed and refined foods, high-sugar beverages, high-sodium snacks) elevate the risk of behavioral and emotional problems in children [13].

Traditional dietary practices, often exemplified by Mediterranean and Japanese models, are typically characterized by (relative to Western practices) higher intakes of fruits and vegetables, fish and seafood, cereals with limited processing, fiber, and only modest amounts of dairy and lean meats [14]. A variety of population studies have linked adherence to traditional dietary patterns with lowered risk of anxiety or depression [15-20]. Among the more convincing of these studies are the recent prospective investigations showing that stronger adherence to traditional healthy dietary patterns is associated with a 25 to 30% lower risk of depression [16,17]. Traditional Japanese dietary practices, where fermented soy products are specifically linked to adherence, have also been associated with lower rates of depressive symptoms [21,22]. Alcohol has deservedly received much attention in the link between problematic consumption and a higher risk of depression. However, when consumed in modest amounts (5 to 15 g per day) as part of traditional dietary practices, alcohol (red wine in particular) has been associated with a lower risk of depression [23]. Indeed, light to moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with lower systemic inflammation, a finding not evident in those with depression [24].

Epidemiological studies show that there exists an elevated risk of depressive symptoms in healthy adults with blood chemistry indicative of insulin resistance [25]. Depressive symptoms correlate with higher fasting and stimulated glucose levels, even in the absence of an association with adiposity in adolescents at risk of type II diabetes [26]. This is of relevance when viewed along with a rapidly growing body of research highlighting the type-II-diabetes protective properties of traditional dietary practices [27]. As we will discuss, the intestinal microbiota, via a number of mechanisms, may play a role in mediating the glycemic and mood related effects of the Western dietary pattern [28].

Specific items within traditional dietary patterns have been individually associated with protection against depression and, experimentally, these components have also demonstrated antidepressant properties. Examples include, but are not limited to soy foods, turmeric, cocoa, green tea, coffee, blueberries, pomegranate, and honey. The isolated polyphenols and other phytochemicals within these foods have also been documented to provide antidepressive properties in experimental models [29-38]. In addition, specific nutrients such as magnesium, zinc, vitamin C, folic acid, and vitamin B12, have also been connected to resiliency against depression or improvement in depressive symptoms [39-42].

The mechanisms by which required nutrients, such as the aforementioned vitamins and minerals, influence mood can be explained in part by their role in the production of neurotransmitters [43]. However, the connection between mood and non-essential dietary components (for example, phytochemicals) has been the subject of intense scrutiny; their role in the antioxidant defense system as well as their ability to provide anti-inflammatory support appears to be at play [44]. Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders have provided a more complete picture of the inducing role played by the tandem of oxidative stress and low-grade inflammation. Elevations in markers of inflammation (for example, cytokines, C-reactive protein), and overwhelm of the normal antioxidant defense system, are no longer dismissed as mere consequence in emotional disorders [45]. The burden of oxidative stress and inflammation is emerging as a viscous cycle that can directly influence mood, and the combination of the two appears to be both a cause and a consequence of depression [46,47]. When levels of body-wide inflammatory cytokines are elevated, they can subsequently signal the production of inflammatory cytokines within the central nervous system via microglia activation. Chronic activation of microglia can compromise neuronal functioning by setting in motion a cascade of further inflammation and oxidative stress [48]. The end result may manifest as compromised intra and extracellular neuronal communication.

Go to:
Inflammation and mood pathways

In this exciting area of research, one of the open questions is how chronic inflammation might be initiated and maintained in illnesses such as depression, and what the gut has to do with this. Emerging studies show that the normally very selective intestinal barrier may be compromised in depression (and in numerous conditions where depression is often a hallmark symptom) [49-56]. Psychological stress and exhaustive exercise have been shown to increase the permeability of the intestinal barrier [57-59]. However, a Westernized diet high in fat and sugar has also been shown to cause a more porous intestinal lining, the consequences of which include systemic access to food antigens, environmental toxins, and structural components of microbes, such as lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (LPS) [60]. The latter agent, LPS, is particularly important regarding depression; even relatively small elevations in systemic LPS levels have been shown to provoke depressive symptoms and disturb blood glucose control [61-67]. Endotoxins such as LPS can decrease the availability of tryptophan and zinc, thereby negatively influencing neurotransmission [68,69]. Moreover, systemic LPS can elevate inflammation and oxidative stress. Traditional dietary practices have completely divergent effects of blood LPS levels; significant reductions (38%) have been noted after a one-month adherence to a prudent (traditional) diet, while the Western diet provokes LPS elevations [70]. These and other findings help establish mechanisms whereby the LPS-lowering, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties of broad traditional dietary practices, as well as specific components within them, can help provide mood support. Indeed, when the limitation of intestinal absorption is overcome, individual phenolic structures have been shown, at least experimentally, to curb the breakdown of central neurotransmitters, mimicking the proposed mechanistic properties of some primary antidepressant medications [71,72]. As we will discuss, enhanced bioavailability via fermentation may therefore be an important factor in food (or herbs) as medicine.

Go to:
Microbiota and mental health

Related to the differences in traditional versus contemporary Westernized dietary patterns and mental health is the role of the intestinal microbiota. A decade ago, prior to the scientific hypotheses of Logan et al.[73,74], the notion that the intentional manipulation of the intestinal microbiota could provide therapeutic value to human depressive and fatigue states was, at the very least, outlandish. However, in the ensuing years, many of the mechanisms first proposed by Logan and colleagues (as listed, adapted from [73,74]) whereby beneficial microbes could influence mood or fatigue, have been examined experimentally.

€¢Direct protection of the intestinal barrier;

€¢Influence on local and systemic antioxidant status, reduction in lipid peroxidation;

€¢Direct, microbial-produced neurochemical production, for example, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA);

€¢Indirect influence on neurotransmitter or neuropeptide production;

€¢Prevention of stress-induced alterations to overall intestinal microbiota;

€¢Direct activation of neural pathways between gut and brain;

€¢Limitation of inflammatory cytokine production;

€¢Modulation of neurotrophic chemicals, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor;

€¢Limitation of carbohydrate malabsorption;

€¢Improvement of nutritional status, for example, omega-3 fatty acids, minerals, dietary phytochemicals;

€¢Limitation of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth;

€¢Reduction of amine or uremic toxin burden;

€¢Limitation of gastric or intestinal pathogens (for example, Helicobacter pylori);

€¢Analgesic properties.

Moreover, preliminary placebo-controlled human studies have shown that oral probiotic microbes can decrease anxiety, diminish perceptions of stress, and improve mental outlook [75]. In the context of our later discussion of fermented foods and their intersection with the gut-brain-microbiota connection, a brief summary of this microbiota-brain research is necessary. For interested readers, more detailed reviews specific to the scientific advances exploring direct and indirect relationships between intestinal microbes and anxiety or depression have recently been published [76,77].

Viewed strictly from the nutritional perspective, experimental studies have shown that the administration of probiotic bacteria to laboratory chow can increase peripheral tryptophan levels, and alter dopamine and serotonin turnover in the frontal cortex and limbic system [78]. In addition, probiotic-fortified laboratory chow increases the tissue levels of omega-3 fatty acids [79], and the omega-3 fatty acids play a critical role in communication in and between nerve cells. The consumption of omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid in particular, has been linked to positive mental outlook and reduction in mental distress in human beings [80]. Levels of other anti-inflammatory fatty acids, such as gamma-linolenic acid, also increase in the human plasma when co-administered with probiotics [81]. It is also becoming increasingly clear that the extent to which phytochemical absorption can provide systemic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity is controlled, at least to some degree, by resident intestinal microbiota [82-84]. Finally, probiotics and the overall profile of the intestinal microbiota can influence tissue levels of mood-regulating minerals, such as magnesium and zinc [85,86].

As mentioned, intestinal microbiota may also have far-reaching effects related to glycemic control; our commensal gut microbes may contribute to healthy glucose tolerance. Indeed, the oral administration of Bifidobacterium lactis, and, in separate research, the combination of Lactobacillus curvatus and Lactobacillus plantarum, can improve fasting insulin levels and glucose turnover rates, even in the presence of a high-fat diet [87,88]. Again, the minimization of the detrimental LPS burden by beneficial microbes appears to be a central mechanism in the promotion of normal glycemic control [89]. For example, bifidobacteria and other beneficial microbes can prevent the efflux of LPS into systemic circulation, while in human beings, the administration of probiotics may diminish systemic access of gut-derived LPS and also reduce reactivity to the endotoxin [90].

Beyond direct nutritional and glycemic effects, there are other intriguing ways in which probiotics and the intestinal microbiota have been connected to the brain. When a strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus is administered to healthy animals under stress, there is a reduction in anxiety and depression-like behaviors in experimental models, such as the elevated plus maze and forced swim tests. These behavioral changes were associated with alterations in the GABA system of the brain in the probiotic group, matching the known effects of antidepressant or anxiolytic chemical agents (for example, anxiolytic agents such as benzodiazepines work at GABA receptors) [91]. Importantly, the changes in behavior and brain chemistry were largely extinguished with vagotomy, suggesting direct lines of communication from gut to brain [90]. Additional research shows that Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum added to animal drinking water can increase nerve cell resiliency and reduce apoptosis during conditions of experimental physiological stress [92]. Moreover, oral Mycobacterium vaccae, a soil-based microorganism widely distributed in nature, which can easily find its way onto edible plants, has been shown in experimental models to improve cognitive function and diminish anxiety-like behavior among animals [93].

There are also a number of studies involving mice reared in germ-free environments, the results of which seem to demonstrate a direct role of intestinal microbiota on behavior. Compared withconventional animals raised with the normal range of intestinal microbiota, these animals display the murine equivalent of what might be decreased anxiety [94-96]. Meanwhile, supplementation with Bifidobacterium appears to attenuate an exaggerated stress response and maintain adequate levels of the neuropeptide brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), levels of which are known to be low in depression [97]. It is also noteworthy that even mild chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract can provoke anxiety and diminish BDNF production in animals [98]. Furthermore, supplementation with Bifidobacterium also provides systemic protection against lipid peroxidation and decreases brain monoamine oxidase activity, thereby potentially increasing intersynaptic neurotransmitter levels [99].

Rodent studies have provided compelling insights; however, they have countless shortcomings as a reflection of human microbiota, human dietary patterns, and the ultimate intertwining of these variables with complex mental health disorders. Far more convincing research, albeit very preliminary at this juncture, comes from published human studies involving probiotic administration. The first formal investigation of a probiotic and human mental outlook involved 132 otherwise healthy adults consuming Lactobacillus casei fermented beverage for three weeks; vs. placebo, significant improvement in mood scores were noted upon the among those with the higher baseline depressive symptoms [100]. A separate placebo-controlled pilot study, one using the same Lactobacillus casei probiotic (powder form), involved 39 chronic fatigue syndrome patients. After two months, depression scores remained unchanged between the groups, however Beck Anxiety Inventory scores showed significant improvements in anxiety versus placebo [101].

Michaël Messaoudi and colleagues from France evaluated a Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum combination probiotic, which was orally administered for one month (n?=?55) in a placebo-controlled study[102]. Among the otherwise healthy adults, significant improvements in depression, anger, anxiety, and lower levels of the stress hormone cortisol versus placebo were noted. A concurrent experimental arm of the study also confirmed that the probiotic added to the dietary of rodents was effective in reducing behaviors indicative of anxiety. Messaoudi €™s group performed a secondary analysis, looking specifically at those with the lowest baseline urinary free cortisol (n?=?25). Indeed, the results once again showed improvement with Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum versus controls (particularly in somatization, depression and anger-hostility), and among this low cortisol sub-group the overall benefits in anxiety and depression were pronounced over time [103]. In addition, a study involving 44 patients with irritable bowel syndrome showed thatoral consumption of a prebiotic fiber (trans-galactooligosaccharide) significantly reduced anxiety in conjunction with marked elevations in fecal bifidobacteria levels [104].

Finally, a small placebo-controlled study involving functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has demonstrated that the one-month consumption of a fermented food containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Lactococcus lactis subsp lactis can influence brain activity versus baseline [105]. Specifically, the researchers reported that the group who received the fermented dairy product, versus unfermented counterpart and the no-intervention controls, affected activity of brain regions that control central processing of emotion and sensation. Enthusiasm concerning this study runs high, with editorials in mainstream journals claiming that this fMRI study, €˜provides the first objective evidence that gut commensal and/or probiotic bacteria influence brain activity in healthy humans €™,[106]. The study, of course, did not provide any such objective evidence concerning ingested bacteria; it was a study involving a transformed milk product, not an isolated probiotic powder. Despite attempts to keep caloric and macronutrient content equal, a fermented milk product is not the same as an unfermented milk product in only its microbiota. Within the study, there was no evidence of a change in gut microbiota profile via consumption of the fermented product; however, more importantly, the fermentation of milk significantly alters bioactive peptides and other chemicals that are well capable of influencing central nervous system function [107-110]. In short, objective evidence that ingested probiotic bacteria alone (or diet-induced shifts in commensal bacteria) can influence human brain activity has yet to be published.

Go to:
Traditional diets and microbiota

Before proceeding to make the case for a more focused investigation of fermented foods for mental health, it is important to discuss the available research on traditional dietary patterns and their ability to influence intestinal microbiota. It is becoming increasingly clear that indigenous or traditional dietary patterns are directly inclusive of many bacterium species that might be considered to have probiotic potential. Indeed, it is estimated that 35% of all lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw fruits and vegetables can survive gastric conditions [111]. The recent study on the anti-anxiety effects of the soil microorganism Mycobacterium vaccae in animals [93] suggests that we would do well to broaden our considerations of the classically defined beneficial microbes, that is, beyond that of exclusively the Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria genera.

One of the first studies examining the effects of traditional diet, 30 years ago, looked at differences in the fecal microbiota of rural Japanese versus Canadian urbanites. The researchers noted higher counts of Bifidobacterium species and Lactobacilli in the rural Japanese, a group that largely maintained a traditional high-fiber diet rich in fermented foods, vegetables, and fish. The investigators used culture technique to examine the microbiota, and despite its limitations as a means to reflect the overall intestinal microbiome, there were some interesting findings. The amounts of Clostridia species in the Canadians were higher, and overall there was greater biodiversity (more genera and species) in the rural-dwelling Japanese [112]. As discussed later, this has been the primary finding of more sophisticated contemporary studies using DNA sequencing of stool samples, that is, there is more bacterial diversity in those consuming traditional diets. In follow-up, this research group reported on the differences in fecal microbiota among older adults residing in Tokyo versus elderly rural Japanese maintaining a high-fiber traditional diet inclusive of fermented foods. The results again showed higher numbers of Bifidobacterium species among the rural dwellers and lower amounts of Clostridium species, Clostridium perfringens in particular [113].

Recent DNA techniques allow for a more broad evaluation of the intestinal microbiome as mediated by diet. Researchers have shown significant differences in the fecal microbiota of Western European children versus rural African children living in an environment resembling that of our Neolithic ancestors. Overall, there were fewer potentially pathogenic bacteria, and a far more diverse range of microbes in rural Africans who maintain a traditional lifestyle and consume traditional foods [114]. It is noteworthy that a variety of fermented foods are consumed by those living in the rural African area which was studied, and there are numerous lactic acid bacteria present on plant foods within this traditional diet [115]. Separate work has uncovered distinct differences in microbial groups and their functional genes (for example, those governing metabolism of amino acids) in US urban dwellers versus villagers living in Africa and South America. Here again, the fecal microbiota of US urbanites showed far less diversity than that of villagers in these distinct regions. Diet, rather than hygiene per se, was reported to be the key spark for the development of intestinal microbiota structure [116]. Remarkably, investigations of highly preserved human coprolites (ancient stool samples retrieved from archeological sites) have demonstrated that their overall microbiome more closely resembles that of modern humans living in traditional rural settlements than that of the contemporary urban dweller [117].

What then, are the broad implications of loss of microbial diversity as a consequence of modernization? Detailed dietary analysis in combination with DNA sequencing of stool samples has its advantages. These techniques have allowed researchers to determine that long-term dietary patterns largely determine the main phyla of the gut microbial profile [118]. However, psychological stress or short-term dietary changes are capable of inducing species-level changes to the intestinal microbiota [119]. While the administration of singular or small groups of select beneficial microbes may not have a major impact on stable phyla, probiotic intervention studies (as discussed previously) have taught us that species-level application of microbes are not without clinical relevance. A single strain of Lactobacillus, one that might be carried with traditional foods, may improve overall microbial diversity [120]. The administration of a single Bifidobacterium strain, one among a genera commonly found in fermented dairy products, can increase the intestinal quantity of completely separate Bifidobacterium species, and Lactobacilli overall [121,122].

Go to:
The potential of fermented foods

Thus far, we have highlighted that depression and other mental health disorders are characterized by chronic, low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress. Conversely, a traditional diet rich in antioxidant, anti-inflammatory foods may confer some level of protection against depression. We have also noted that an intestinal €˜inflammatory microbiome €™ appears to exist, one that may contribute to altered mood via intestinal permeability, systemic LPS burden, and even direct-to-brain microbe communication. Such an inflammatory microbiome may be facilitated, at least in part, by Western dietary habits. Research shows that high-fat or high-sugar and low nutrient-value foods are commonly consumed by those with depression, anxiety, and high levels of chronic distress [123-125], thus contributing to the likelihood of an inflammatory microbiome. Preliminary research in rodents and human beings suggests that the behavioral consequences of an inflammatory microbiome can be offset by the administration of beneficial microbes. All this leads us full circle to the ancient Neolithic vessels in asking to what extent fermented foods or beverages might contribute to mental health. We are certainly not the first to ask this question in the broad sense; in 1938, Lloyd Arnold, MD, aptly a professor of both preventive medicine and bacteriology at the University of Illinois, pondered to what extent ancient diets, fermented foods, and their effect on the €˜bacterial flora of the intra-intestinal contents €™ converged to promote health [126].

Today, scientific advances allow for some answers in the direction toward the potential of fermented foods. It is well established that with traditional dietary patterns, fermentation can magnify protein quality [127] and the bioavailabity of mood-regulating B vitamins, magnesium, and zinc [128-131]. The effect of diet on intestinal microbiota may also extend to vitamin D levels [132]. However, it is also becoming clear that the Lactobacillus species isolated from traditional fermented foods are biologically active in other ways, for example, upon oral consumption, Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from traditional Chinese fermented foods provide strong antioxidant protection in animals [133]. Fermentation of fruit and herbal smoothies with Lactobacillus plantarum and other strains has been shown to preserve their polyphenolic compounds and vitamin C, and as expected, this enhances subsequent free radical scavenging activity that would otherwise be lost with storage [134]. Fermented soymilk also has a more pronounced antioxidant capacity than unfermented soymilk, and this activity is further enhanced by the synergistic application of both lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria together versus only Lactobacilli or Bifidobacterium strains alone [135].

The fermentation of fiber-rich components of traditional diets, such as, soy germ, wheat germ, rice bran, or breads made via traditional fermentation techniques, have been shown to produce novel bioactive compounds capable of producing beneficial immune, glycemic, and anti-inflammatory activities [136-139]. In the case of fermented rice bran, where enhanced phenolic availability has been noted, there is specific experimental evidence indicating beneficial mental properties via the bioactive compounds. More specifically, compared with controls, oral administration of fermented rice bran extract reduced experimental fatigue and stress [140,141]. Fermentation of rice bran, and other traditional foods, such as mung beans, buckwheat sprouts, and lentils, is known to increase the available GABA content significantly [142-144]. Whereas synthetic GABA in oral form has been classically dismissed as of limited benefit due to absorption issues, research has reported value of the oral administration of GABA derived from Lactobacillus hilgardii fermentation in anxiety reduction in human beings, and antidepressant activity via the administration of GABA-rich red yeast rice [145,146].

Recent evidence suggests that the health-promoting target of flavonoids is directed toward the human gut bacterial metagenomes, and that these benefits have an evolutionary origin. Functional analysis using clusters of orthologous groups of bacteria target proteins suggests that flavonoids regulate the metabolism of gut microbiota [147]. Experimental research has shown that when common dietary polyphenols are subjected to fermentation, the newly formed biotransformation phytochemicals are more capable of causing a beneficial shift in microbial growth stimulation [148]. In positioning fermented foods as worthy of discussion for cognitive and mental benefits, recent comparative research involving fermented and non-fermented foods and herbal ingredients is worthy of consideration. Researchers have examined the in vivo properties of an herbal blend typically used in traditional medicine to treat inflammatory disorders, comparing its effects in the unfermented and fermented form. Blood LPS levels were significantly lower when treated with the fermented blend, as was C-reactive protein, a primary marker of systemic inflammation. There was also a significant reduction in LPS-induced intestinal permeability and a significant rise in stool Lactobacillus species, neither of which was noted with the unfermented blend [149].

Similar research has been documented with fermented and unfermented herbs used for gastrointestinal disorders, that is, more pronounced anti-inflammatory activity and minimization of LPS-induced gene expression with the fermented blend [150]. In separate work involving a singular traditional food or medicinal agent, the anti-inflammatory botanical Sophora flavescens, researchers, again using LPS as the inducing agent, found a more pronounced anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity with the fermented form [151]. Recently red wine has been shown to increase Bifidobacterium levels, which in turn correlates with lower serum LPS concentrations [152]. Fermented grape pomace yields more total antioxidants and antioxidant activity than its unfermented counterpart [153]. Remarkably, even fermented fish oil, an agent with well-documented anti-inflammatory and mood-support properties, has been shown to provide an enhanced anti-inflammatory activity versus its unfermented counterpart [154]. Given our previous discussions concerning LPS-induced inflammation, intestinal permeability and glycemic control, it should not be surprising, perhaps, that fermented (versus unfermented) dairy products can improve glucose metabolism and improve antioxidant status in human beings [155,156].

The connection between fermented dairy products and the growth of beneficial intestinal microbes has been well described. However, the findings that (non-dairy) fermented foods and herbs can have a positive influence on the intestinal microbiota are important in that there may be an influence on longer-term gut-brain communication. For example, isomalto-oligosaccharides are found in traditional foods (for example, honey, sake, miso, and soy sauce) and have been shown in animals and human beings to have a beneficial effect in promoting the growth of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli[157]. Providing just a few examples, fermented (versus unfermented) burdock has been shown to significantly promote the growth of bifidobacteria [158]; similar findings have been reported for fermented versus unfermented soy [159]. The species-level microbiota within local fermented foods is reflected in stool samples of the human host [160]. When researchers make discoveries such as that showing that a Lactobacillus pentosus strain derived from fermented cabbage (kimchi) can improve mental functioning and hippocampal BDNF production in animals [161], the entire mosaic takes on greater meaning. It suggests that we are only scratching the surface in our understanding of the relationship between potentially beneficial food-derived microbes and brain health.

Go to:
Conclusions

The purposeful application of fermentation for food preservation, palatability, and other reasons is an ancient art. Modern research is highlighting the potential value of ancestral dietary practices on mental health, and on resiliency against depression in particular. At the same time, there has been tremendous progress toward better understanding of the role played by the low-grade inflammation and the intestinal microbiome in human health and mental well-being [162,163]. Evidence would suggest that the two major themes of these mostly separate highways of research should converge; in other words, the fermented foods so often included in traditional dietary practices have the potential to influence brain health by virtue of the microbial action that has been applied to the food or beverage, and by the ways in which the fermented food or beverage directly influences our own microbiota. This could manifest, behaviorally, via magnified antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, reduction of intestinal permeability and the detrimental effects of LPS, improved glycemic control, positive influence on nutritional status (and therefore neurotransmission and neuropeptide production), direct production of GABA, and other bioactive chemicals, as well as a direct role in gut-to-brain communication via a beneficial shift in the intestinal microbiota itself.

In this discussion, we may unwittingly give the impression that fermentation is exclusively a beneficial application to food and beverage production. Such is not the case and not all forms of fermentation or fermented foods can be painted with the same brush. For example, certain microorganisms (for example, fungi) associated with pickled foods may enhance the production of N-nitroso compounds with potential carcinogenic properties [164]. Also, although agmatine and other polyamines found in fermented meats, fish, and certain beverages have been shown to have a variety of experimental benefits related to brain health [165,166], a safe level of intake remains unknown [165]. However, as outlined in our review, there is more than ample justification to follow the microbe-nutrition and gut-brain research pathways into convergence. The clinical world of mental health involves one where consumption of convenient, high-fat, or high-sugar foods is the norm; these foods, at odds with our evolutionary past, are not only undermining optimal nutritional status, they have untold effects on the microbiome and ultimately the brain. Hopefully, further research will continue to illuminate the ways in which the clay fermentation pots of our ancestors might be connected to the emerging discipline of nutritional psychiatry.

Go to:
Abbreviations

BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; GABA: gamma-aminobutyric acid; LPS: lipopolysaccharide endotoxin.

Go to:
Competing interests

ACL has received consulting fees from Genuine Health, Toronto, Canada. EMS and ACB have no competing interests.

Go to:
Authors €™ contributions

All authors contributed equal time and effort to the investigation, research, and drafting of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


 

Similar threads

Top