H
hairhair98
Valued member
Telling young people they should proceed very carefully with something like this, and that they should pursue less permanent options first, is a very useful message. However, you come off as stubborn when you say things like 'anyone who treats a young person is unethical', or imply that no young person should ever get smp.
To your credit, i feel you do have an open mind in regards to new ideas, and are giving SMP a much more fair critique than you were several months ago, even if you still personally dont like it.
SMP (as well as HT) compatibility goes on a case by case basis, especially for young people. At the other forum we tell people that they probably shouldn't do it if it looks like they dont really need it. However, for many young guys it is past the point of just needing a little concealer, and in those cases SMP can be appropriate, and far less risky than a HT.
I completely understand where you are coming from in regards to not wanting to see young guys make mistakes on impulse, but your language often comes off as making it seem like SMP is a 100% mistake for anyone under 25... which clearly isn't how it is.
I have no problem with discussing the negative aspects of SMP, i think it's important that the drawbacks of SMP (of which there are many) should be known to anyone that is considering it.
The problem i have with that thread was how you and TC were stating your speculations as facts, and then applying them to all SMP organizations. Implying that no matter where they had the treatment, it would make them a laughing stock to their friends, they would never get women, and it would eventually turn blue.
There is a good message at the heart of that thread, but it is lost in a sea of fear-mongering rhetoric (mostly from TC).
While i share your concern about not wanting anyone to make a mistake... either by the clinic they choose, or by SMP itself... i am also just as concerned about people who could improve their lives with it being led away because of bad information... and in that sense i feel that thread may do more harm than good.
To your credit, i feel you do have an open mind in regards to new ideas, and are giving SMP a much more fair critique than you were several months ago, even if you still personally dont like it.
Ok, but why let bad clinics take that option completely off the table for young guys?I know you can link me to threads of young guys that have had SMP and are ecstatic about the results. Thats great for them, but its the ones that have SMP with bad results that we will never hear about.
SMP (as well as HT) compatibility goes on a case by case basis, especially for young people. At the other forum we tell people that they probably shouldn't do it if it looks like they dont really need it. However, for many young guys it is past the point of just needing a little concealer, and in those cases SMP can be appropriate, and far less risky than a HT.
I completely understand where you are coming from in regards to not wanting to see young guys make mistakes on impulse, but your language often comes off as making it seem like SMP is a 100% mistake for anyone under 25... which clearly isn't how it is.
One thing about SMP that surely you must agree on though. Sometimes although you and i will never agree. Reading Topcats thread even if you view it as anti SMP bias. It will make that reader ask questions that he would never have originally asked. It will make them think and research SMP deeper.
I have no problem with discussing the negative aspects of SMP, i think it's important that the drawbacks of SMP (of which there are many) should be known to anyone that is considering it.
The problem i have with that thread was how you and TC were stating your speculations as facts, and then applying them to all SMP organizations. Implying that no matter where they had the treatment, it would make them a laughing stock to their friends, they would never get women, and it would eventually turn blue.
There is a good message at the heart of that thread, but it is lost in a sea of fear-mongering rhetoric (mostly from TC).
While i share your concern about not wanting anyone to make a mistake... either by the clinic they choose, or by SMP itself... i am also just as concerned about people who could improve their lives with it being led away because of bad information... and in that sense i feel that thread may do more harm than good.





