F
folliclediabolical
Valued member
Reading a post on another forum which ive pasted below,and seeing a friend of mine who is completely bald on top with only a 3" donor area at the lower back of the scalp has got me thinking.Are we just constantly chasing the baldness away with HT's?.I know some people respond well to meds and not everyone will end up in the high norwood scale's,but if you look at a lot of guys in their late 40's and 50's that have lost their hair,there totally bald on top.to cover that would take numerouse procedures surely,so even if they started when they were a low norwood scale,they would just be chasing it year after year.
Another good point in the post below is that looking at these guys donor areas,theres hardly anything left of them,so if you have a few strip procedures,the scars could well be visible as the donor line drops.
Sorry to put a downer on things but my research into HT's and all things balding has been a bit of a rollercoaster.Just when i think ive decided to go for it,i come across some info or a situation and think perhaps id be better off letting nature take its course.
What are other people opinion's?
hair forum post:
http://anotherforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1466060861/m/828103544
Another good point in the post below is that looking at these guys donor areas,theres hardly anything left of them,so if you have a few strip procedures,the scars could well be visible as the donor line drops.
Sorry to put a downer on things but my research into HT's and all things balding has been a bit of a rollercoaster.Just when i think ive decided to go for it,i come across some info or a situation and think perhaps id be better off letting nature take its course.
What are other people opinion's?
hair forum post:
http://anotherforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1466060861/m/828103544