H
hairhair98
Valued member
Californication wrote:
In my first reply to him (and in subsequent ones), i told him the cancer issue was a valid subject for discussion.
What you quoted me saying here concerned his refusal to answer/discuss the points i had been raising about everything else he was saying.
hairhair98 wrote:Dude, just no.Zero relevant evidence, zero ability to answer relevant questions... kids, this is what happens when you make a flawed argument. Game, set, and match. Anyone who makes it this far will be able to see right through you.
To those wondering about SMP, i encourage you to stop in at the HIS forum. There you will find actual feedback from hundreds of guys from ages 20 to 60. Dont take my word for it, read what they have to say.
p.s. i have an extensive diary there that you can read, if anyone wonders about my motives here.
Topcat is way off on the aesthetics point of the SMP and I'm glad you called him out on it but you're just as off base on the BIGGEST issue there is about the treatment: cancer. That IS a relevant point, the health concern is absolutely there, and for you to act like it isn't and just mindlessly suggest others get the treatment without considering this risk at least is actually more damaging than any anything topcat has done.
You need to consider the pros and cons as an individual and one of the cons which topcat has pointed out is potentially a very big con.
In my first reply to him (and in subsequent ones), i told him the cancer issue was a valid subject for discussion.
What you quoted me saying here concerned his refusal to answer/discuss the points i had been raising about everything else he was saying.





