H
hairtech
member
Do the old "plugs" yield better than an FUT or FUE?
More than likely they do. And I hate to even give this recognition to an old school plug. But then we have to figure out why this may be the case.
Bigmac and bullitnut brought up an interesting statement/post in this thread:
http://www.hairlossexperiences.com/view_topic.php?id=1090&forum_id=2
I quote," My Norton plugs are still going strong.;;D"
Why? And more importantly why do we see plug transplants having high yields in terms of growth?
Recently there have been studies that are now providing a more definitive insight to the yields of plugs, minnis, mugs, DFU's, FUT, and FUE grafts. And the yields of each are definitely different. Why?
Let us explore this.
Any clinic, doctor, individual... please give input, theory or hypothesis. No post is stupid. ))N_)
More than likely they do. And I hate to even give this recognition to an old school plug. But then we have to figure out why this may be the case.
Bigmac and bullitnut brought up an interesting statement/post in this thread:
http://www.hairlossexperiences.com/view_topic.php?id=1090&forum_id=2
I quote," My Norton plugs are still going strong.;;D"
Why? And more importantly why do we see plug transplants having high yields in terms of growth?
Recently there have been studies that are now providing a more definitive insight to the yields of plugs, minnis, mugs, DFU's, FUT, and FUE grafts. And the yields of each are definitely different. Why?
Let us explore this.
Any clinic, doctor, individual... please give input, theory or hypothesis. No post is stupid. ))N_)
Last edited: