HST by HASCI clinic- 80% donor regeneration

[mars]

I had punch outs on my hairline,these grafts were planted very poorly some were pitted,mis-directed etc..also the depts of each graft was different as it was a very poor job i had done,when these grafts were removed the grafts were re-used but some of these grafts kept re-growing and had to be punched out again,i found this intesesting as some cells remained and grew another hair,i dont know how someone could purposely do this safely and be good at it,until i see a norwood 5-6 becoming a norwood 1-2 i dont believe this works!

 

[Skywalker]

"....until i see a norwood 5-6 becoming a norwood 1-2 i dont believe this works!"
=========================================================

So you didn't believe in FUE for many many MANY years either then...

With HST you have to wait a year to reuse the donor area and as the limit up until
recently was about 1,000 a time (it has now grown to about 2,500) your requirement is frankly a bit silly.

I understand that you don't believe this can work but as you admit you know nothing about this subject I'm not sure that counts for much.

 

[Galileo]

Skywalker wrote:

He extracts using a 0.6mm tool and implants into the recipient area using a 0.5mm tool.

And from where did you get this information?

Surely not from any of Gho's scientific papers nor from his website nor straight from Dr. Gho's mouth.

 

[Skywalker]

Galileo wrote:

Skywalker wrote:

He extracts using a 0.6mm tool and implants into the recipient area using a 0.5mm tool.

And from where did you get this information?

Surely not from any of Gho's scientific papers nor from his website nor straight from Dr. Gho's mouth.

Why the accusatory tone Galileo ? If you don't want this information that's fine - I don't benefit in any way by putting it out there. In fact with Dr Gho's waiting list it is probably in my interest for you to not investigate the possibilities of this.

For the record it was from either Dr Gho or his consultant, I cannot remember which - but anyway, it's on his website :whatever:

 

[Galileo]

Skywalker wrote:

Galileo wrote:

Skywalker wrote:

He extracts using a 0.6mm tool and implants into the recipient area using a 0.5mm tool.

And from where did you get this information?

Surely not from any of Gho's scientific papers nor from his website nor straight from Dr. Gho's mouth.

Why the accusatory tone Galileo ? If you don't want this information that's fine - I don't benefit in any way by putting it out there. In fact with Dr Gho's waiting list it is probably in my interest for you to not investigate the possibilities of this.

For the record it was from either Dr Gho or his consultant, I cannot remember which - but anyway, it's on his website :whatever:

What you still claim, is NOT on the website!

On the website they just say "The receptor area is prepared with the same instrument: tiny holes are made in the area or areas where new hair growth is desired."

In the scientific paper ...

http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloads/dad01225-0ceb-4a30-90c4-771ed900f25aHSI%20-%20Artikel_Gho%20Neumann.pdf

... they use THE SAME NEEDLE DIAMETER.

In this educational video ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jInUNLY-Yvg

... they explain that they -of course- always use the same needle diameter in the recipient area as used for the extractions of HST grafts in the donor area.

So PLEASE - don't make claims without EVIDENCE - simply because I do not like the latter. ))N_)

 

[Skywalker]

Galileo wrote

So PLEASE - don't make claims without EVIDENCE - simply because I do not like the latter. ))N_)

0.6mm is on the website, I checked to make sure it is still there. You're obviously not looking in the right place. I was told this during my consultation about 0.5mm in the recipient site, but let's suppose for the sake of argument that they use 0.6mm in both extraction and recipient sites - so what - how is this a problem, why would I lie about such a trivial thing ? I just passed on the information I was given, if you don't like it I don't mind.

Your ridiculous accusations and immediate attack mode without being sure of your facts tells me that one of 2 things is true - either you have an agenda or you are a complete tool.

 

[Galileo]

topccat29 wrote:

"I recommend fue with hand punches in the .70-.85 range. In my research 10+ years..."

Can you explain me please what exactly FUE doctors can extract with 0.70-0.85 punches?

 

[SADbutTRUE]

im open to new ideas and methods , is he on to something new , im not sure, results are what its all about, the more results shown the faster this method will spread, all top clinics , strip or fue,show top result after top result, untill more grown out results are shown , there will always be unanswered questins on this new tech.

 

[Galileo]

SADbutTRUE wrote:

im open to new ideas and methods , is he on to something new , im not sure

try to find out more

http://www.thebaldtruth.com/hair-loss/spencer-kobren-speak-with-dr-coen-gho-is-hair-stemcell-transplantationhst-the-future-of-hair-restoration/

 

[SADbutTRUE]

ive read up on his methods before, i just searched his website and his result page has some decent results and some need more work, but there is nograft counts for each patient, or how mant sessions each patient had, the results is where its at, if this really does work then it would be great in the ht field,and help so many guys with depleated donor,and any balding man or woman,that wants to restore hair, untill more results are on the web, it will stay in the shadows,there are diehard fans of this , ive noticed,but ill be more convinced it works when several resuls are posted on the forums by patients, fingers crossed.any new thing that can help ,im for it, just need solid evidence.full grown out results as well as donor shaved, to see if any scarring,im sure many feel the same

 

[Skywalker]

SADbutTRUE wrote:

...ill be more convinced it works when several resuls are posted on the forums by patients, fingers crossed.any new thing that can help ,im for it, just need solid evidence.full grown out results as well as donor shaved, to see if any scarring,im sure many feel the same

The evidence you speak of is already out there - whether you believe it or not is for an individual to evaluate - which is not easy admittedly c;;9