Thankyou all for the kind replies,
It appears that a scar revision is a gamble as there are no guarantee it will improve my situation, therefor I`m leaning towards a small Fue session.
I also came across an article written by Dr. Shapiro which confirms my findings. See below.
For scar revisions the use of the trichophytic closure is more variable. It may be effective if the pre-existing scar is thin, there is sufficient laxity remaining, and the entire scar can be excised with limited tension, than it may work well. However if the pre-existing scar is wide and there is decreased laxity than the technique may be less affective for the following reasons. The decreased laxity may make it impossible to remove the entire scar at once. The decreased laxity will increase wound tension and the potential for the new scar to stretch out again. Finally, \the edge of wounds in a scar may have less hair present to grow through which limits the effectiveness of the trichophytic closure.
The Trichophytic closure is not a magic technique that will automatically create a less visible scar if these other rules are not followed. All three innovators of the technique still emphasize that it is still necessary to use all the rules and methods usually employed to create fine scars. (i.e. limit wound tension, create good skin approximation, properly space sutures or staples, etc). As stated above the trichophytic closure does not limit the width of a scar but instead, primarily masks a scar by letting hair grow through it. Since only a 1 to 2 mm wide zone of epithelium is trimmed away, and this creates only a 1-2 mm width of exposed follicles, the trichophytic incision works best when the scar resulting from the donor incision is 1-2 mm or less. When this occurs the results can be amazing and with the scar being nearly undetectable even with the hair cut short. However if the underlying scar resulting from the donor incision is wider than 1-2 mm, for whatever reason, the benefit is less dramatic. There are a number of reasons why a scar may occasionally end up being wider than expected. This is true no matter what technique is used and no matter who the surgeon is.
