B
Barren
Valued member
Hi,
This is something I often wonder when reviewing patient post-op photos, to be honest, largely because it will apply to me should I have a procedure.
If we take a patient who has signifcant recession, but their forelock remains strong and the patient would like their hairline rebuilt, why, as far as I can see, do many doctors place grafts in front of the forelock?
To me, one of the weakest areas of a hairtransplant is the hairline, by weakest I mean the aspect of a hairtransplant that would potentially 'give the game away'. Some of the most natural looking transplants I have seen are where the transplanted hair is placed just behind the forelock or what remains of it, leaving existing native hair exposed thus hiding the transition from skin to transplanted hair that would occur should the doctor place gafts in front of the forelock.
I guess doctors do this so that there's a more uniform appearance to the hairline instead of a mixture of native and transplanted hair, and also if they expect that the forelock will eventually thin out?
However, what if prior to hairloss the patient had a naturally low hairline, and the forelock remains strong in this position, if the patient feels that the transplanted hair can't go lower than the forelock, what is the best strategy in that case? I know it would vary from doctor to doctor, but I'd like to get peoples opinion on this
Thanks
This is something I often wonder when reviewing patient post-op photos, to be honest, largely because it will apply to me should I have a procedure.
If we take a patient who has signifcant recession, but their forelock remains strong and the patient would like their hairline rebuilt, why, as far as I can see, do many doctors place grafts in front of the forelock?
To me, one of the weakest areas of a hairtransplant is the hairline, by weakest I mean the aspect of a hairtransplant that would potentially 'give the game away'. Some of the most natural looking transplants I have seen are where the transplanted hair is placed just behind the forelock or what remains of it, leaving existing native hair exposed thus hiding the transition from skin to transplanted hair that would occur should the doctor place gafts in front of the forelock.
I guess doctors do this so that there's a more uniform appearance to the hairline instead of a mixture of native and transplanted hair, and also if they expect that the forelock will eventually thin out?
However, what if prior to hairloss the patient had a naturally low hairline, and the forelock remains strong in this position, if the patient feels that the transplanted hair can't go lower than the forelock, what is the best strategy in that case? I know it would vary from doctor to doctor, but I'd like to get peoples opinion on this
Thanks
Last edited:





