Dr Arvind
Valued member
On various platforms - 1. talking to doctors in ht conferences,2. talking to prospective repair ht patients,
in these 2 events specially, I don't know who is more to blame - the untrained (maybe greedy) doctor, or the bargain hunting/greedy patient.
I am not talking of first time patients who accidently trusted a self acclaimed ht doctor. Nor the untrained doctor who does a bad ht and realizes he should not operate on the patients further till he gets comprehensive training.I am talking of a patient who got 2 supposed strip surgeries, 2 so called fue, a so called stem cell and mesotherapy - I could see a depleted donor and maybe 1200 hair at max in the recipient. And he was still considering thediscount offer he was being offered for laser and robotic fue. Kismet! I said to myself and told him not to go any further and I will not treat him till I believed he had done proper research.
As you know we encourage those looking to get hair transplants to meet past patients who have already got ht and interact with them before making any decision.
But the sad part is when I meet some patients who have undergone really bad ht, a lot of donor wastage and still do not learn even from personal experience.
In our free seminar I had the sad experience of meeting 4 people today who had not only bad ht but almost depleted donor and were still thinking of offers like "unlimited hair for $100".
On my part, I refuse to treat these patients and tell them to research on the discussion forums for an year atleast.
But it is sad to see in this era of online knowledge access that we have more bad hair transplants then ever before.I think prospective patients are equally if not more to blame.
Any advise and suggestions on this situation would be welcome.Regards, Dr.A
in these 2 events specially, I don't know who is more to blame - the untrained (maybe greedy) doctor, or the bargain hunting/greedy patient.
I am not talking of first time patients who accidently trusted a self acclaimed ht doctor. Nor the untrained doctor who does a bad ht and realizes he should not operate on the patients further till he gets comprehensive training.I am talking of a patient who got 2 supposed strip surgeries, 2 so called fue, a so called stem cell and mesotherapy - I could see a depleted donor and maybe 1200 hair at max in the recipient. And he was still considering thediscount offer he was being offered for laser and robotic fue. Kismet! I said to myself and told him not to go any further and I will not treat him till I believed he had done proper research.
As you know we encourage those looking to get hair transplants to meet past patients who have already got ht and interact with them before making any decision.
But the sad part is when I meet some patients who have undergone really bad ht, a lot of donor wastage and still do not learn even from personal experience.
In our free seminar I had the sad experience of meeting 4 people today who had not only bad ht but almost depleted donor and were still thinking of offers like "unlimited hair for $100".
On my part, I refuse to treat these patients and tell them to research on the discussion forums for an year atleast.
But it is sad to see in this era of online knowledge access that we have more bad hair transplants then ever before.I think prospective patients are equally if not more to blame.
Any advise and suggestions on this situation would be welcome.Regards, Dr.A
Last edited:





