• Welcome to Hair loss Experiences hair loss forum.

    Free impartial hair loss advice, hair transplant advice, hair loss medications and hair loss news.
    You can contact us directly at [email protected] if you experience any problems.

Are 4k graftss with FUE Dangerous?

G

givememyhair

Valued member
Hi,
I am in the process of shortlisting my FUE Doctor and want to go for 4000 grafts. I was adviced by one of the doctors that doing more than 3000 Grafts (over a 2 day session) with FUE Is dangerous as it will damage the integrity of the donor area and result in a lower growth rate and wasted grafts.
I would love to know the community's opinions on this?
 
Bigmac

Bigmac

Administrator
Staff member
It's a tough one as some doctors say it is dangerous whilst others regularly carry out large cases, which doctor advised you against it.
 
J

Jessop

Valued member
I've seen procedures with over 4000 grafts. They looked good.
 
Prohairclinic

Prohairclinic

Prohairclinic Scalp Micro Pigmentation
This is a technical debate and it is not a black and white answer.

First of all removing virtually any number of FUE with small punches is not 'dangerous' as in risking health problems.

The reason why most ethical docs and institutes will avoid extremely large numbers is donor area shock loss and donor management.

Often we get email request from NW7 patient demanding 4000 grafts. It is not realistic and we need to explain why these amounts of extractions would likely cause more problems than solve them.

In our experience we like to limit our sessions to 3000-3500 grafts over 2 days for untouched donor.
It is virtually impossible to provide and execute an intelligent extraction pattern where no adjacent grafts are removed above a certain number (and again, this varies a lot from patient to patient).

We also note that in some countries it seems that there is some sort of competition involved of who can do the most grafts in a single day session. Prohairclinic will not follow this route, we stand for optimal quality given each patient hair situation.

Bart
 
Last edited:
topccat29

topccat29

29 year HT veteran
It's not that it is dangerous it's that smaller is always without a doubt safer.
Logic would tell us that the less wounding incurred the better the healing.
 
Last edited:
bullitnut

bullitnut

4 awesome repairs with SMG
topccat29 wrote:
It's not that it is dangerous it's that smaller is always without a doubt safer.
Logic would tell us that the less wounding incurred the better the healing.

Great comment Topcat!

You got any doctors in mind Givememyhair?
 
Top