topccat29 wrote:
Harm in the way that I think tattooing one's head looks like complete shit and makes the person look like a clown.
Let me ask you... have you ever seen this in person? Similarly, have you spent any meaningful time at a reputable SMP clinic's forum? Or are you only basing all of this on the results you get when you google 'bad smp results'?
If you haven't done either of the above, you really shouldn't be doling out advice about it.
I had a bad hair transplant many years ago, and am bitter about the surgical side of the industry. Do you know why i dont make threads like this one about surgical options? Because i have'nt spent time researching that side of the industry, and i am in no position to tell people what to do. I understand that i am not an expert on the issue, and i leave it up to the people that are.
As someone who is fairly experienced about SMP, you sound like you dont know what you are talking about. Nearly everything you say is contradicted by the feedback seen on the internet.
Maybe you have guys that like that look and I say good for you.
the hair dot thing is not fooling anyone.
Feedback on SMP forums indicates that nearly all people say it looks good, and better than what the person previously was doing.
It also indicates that nearly everyone finds that it goes undetected, and that even when told about it some people still express disbelief that it is a tattoo.
You know... 'real' feedback from the 'real' world.
LOL................I mean really you're not going to change my mind...............it's shit in my opinion.
Yes, it's obvious that you are only interested in discussing bad SMP treatments from sub-par clinics.
You seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that good SMP treatments/clinics exist, even though there is a mountain of evidence out there that they do. You know... like when the only person in this forum that agreed with what you were saying stated that SMP looks good when done the right way.
Pull your head outta the dirt. Are you interested in helping people, or are you interested in always being right by way of only discussing bad SMP clinics/results? It seems the latter.
The cheerleaders should pitch in and compensate this guy. They come on here and act stupid asking questions like they don t know what is up.
Oh we know what's up. What's up is that there are bad SMP clinics just like there are bad surgeons. Isn't that common sense? Why are you implying that anyone here is sticking up for a company that performs work that turns blue, or is in some other way terrible quality? That clearly isn't happening.
This is why in one of my earlier replies i said that if you really want to help people, you should caution them to only get SMP from a reputable clinic.
I could provide you links to disaster stories where people tried to save some money against our advice and it came back to bite them... but i really dont think you care. It seems you are having a better time with your fantasy that myself, and people like me, are evil geniuses somehow profiting from a life-destroying cosmetic procedure... even though we have had the treatment done to ourselves.
That person on your own forum with the blue head thread.
I could re-explain what is going on there, or how black pigments cant turn blue, but i assume you would re-ignore it.
How about this instead... why dont you go back through the archives of the HIS forum and show me threads where the treatment permanently turned blue and had to be removed. If it's as common as you think it is, you should be able to find dozens in no time.
I'll wait.
The point I was trying to make earlier is that when you have a shit product you have to work very hard at trying to sell it..........to convince others.
Yeah. That's why HIS has expanded all over the US in the past couple of years with hardly any advertising besides whats on YouTube. Because it's terrible and no one likes it. Right.
Why is it that most people on the forum (including me) make an effort to see it in person before making the decision, and nearly everyone (including me) state that it looks great in person, and is something they want to do? Nearly everyone that has it done sees it in person first, but you claim that 'it's not fooling anyone' and looks terrible. So why do so many people (thousands) still get it done, and then recommend it to others? Is it that so many people are out of touch with what does and doesn't look good?
Or is it perhaps that you might be wrong about how it actually looks, when performed by a reputable clinic?
It's not like I'm angry............in fact the whole thing is really making me laugh..............
Trust me brother, you aren't the only one laughing at this thread.