A
andieje
Member
Hi
I was wondering if there were any objective criteria that you could use to assess the quality of a hair transplant surgeon. I appreciate that you can look at 'before and after pictures' of hair transplants but I imagine a surgeon can showcase their best results and hide their disasters.
Are there any societies or guilds that a reputable surgeon should be a member of?
Are there any procedural details that are hallmarks of a good surgeon? This is slightly more obscure but as an example I was told that a good surgeon shouldn't use adrenaline during the procedure as it is unnecessary and increases the risk of shockloss. I've also been told that the gauge (width) of the incision equipment used by the surgeon shows their skill level. The details I have just given may be incorrect and I'm more than happy to be corrected if I am wrong.
Many thanks for your help
I was wondering if there were any objective criteria that you could use to assess the quality of a hair transplant surgeon. I appreciate that you can look at 'before and after pictures' of hair transplants but I imagine a surgeon can showcase their best results and hide their disasters.
Are there any societies or guilds that a reputable surgeon should be a member of?
Are there any procedural details that are hallmarks of a good surgeon? This is slightly more obscure but as an example I was told that a good surgeon shouldn't use adrenaline during the procedure as it is unnecessary and increases the risk of shockloss. I've also been told that the gauge (width) of the incision equipment used by the surgeon shows their skill level. The details I have just given may be incorrect and I'm more than happy to be corrected if I am wrong.
Many thanks for your help





