• Welcome to Hair loss Experiences hair loss forum.

    Free impartial hair loss advice, hair transplant advice, hair loss medications and hair loss news.
    You can contact us directly at [email protected] if you experience any problems.

Help! Urgent advice needed for daunted individual!

R

Rosemary21

Guest
Cost of Hair Transplantation is low cost and high quality. Check this web page beautifymed.com All you have to buy your flight ticket and 3 days off to go Istanbul .Cost of one session aroun £1400-£1600 depends or tratment plan..
Giving a quote through photos may misleading therefore Surgeon must see your hair alive.
 
R

Rosemary2021

member
hi please check www. beautifymed.com We strongly suggest you FUE thats most practical and best way to do it also popular!
 
John Cole MD

John Cole MD

Valued member
I would not consider FUT. In 2003 I was an expert in FUT. There was a reason I changed. All the benefits are on the patient side with FUE. That's why I changed my practice from 100% FUT to 100% FUE. One cannot predict a strip scar. Every month I find myself correcting strip scars. It's hard to imagine that 18 years later we are still dealing with surgeons promoting FUT, but they are a dying breed for a reason. In 2003 FUE was the least common hair restoration surgical procedure. Today, FUE is the most common hair restoration surgical procedure. Find a good FUE surgeon and go for it. That is my opinion. Wishing you great results. If truly interested, I'll give you every reason to avoid FUT. I've expounded them for years while few listened. Certainly, a good surgeon is the first step. The second is the right procedure that will be best for you over time. I think you have some excellent options, but avoid FUT in my opinion. One thing you will never hear the FUT surgeon repeat is the study I presented in 2014 showing that FUT kills hair in the donor area due to traction alopecia.
 
John Cole MD

John Cole MD

Valued member
I'm not sure how it helps. Low costs usually equate to bad results, donor depletion, and lost future options. I'd love to be proven wrong on that
 
  • Like
Reactions: sl
K

Kopkin

member
I would not consider FUT. In 2003 I was an expert in FUT. There was a reason I changed. All the benefits are on the patient side with FUE. That's why I changed my practice from 100% FUT to 100% FUE. One cannot predict a strip scar. Every month I find myself correcting strip scars. It's hard to imagine that 18 years later we are still dealing with surgeons promoting FUT, but they are a dying breed for a reason. In 2003 FUE was the least common hair restoration surgical procedure. Today, FUE is the most common hair restoration surgical procedure. Find a good FUE surgeon and go for it. That is my opinion. Wishing you great results. If truly interested, I'll give you every reason to avoid FUT. I've expounded them for years while few listened. Certainly, a good surgeon is the first step. The second is the right procedure that will be best for you over time. I think you have some excellent options, but avoid FUT in my opinion. One thing you will never hear the FUT surgeon repeat is the study I presented in 2014 showing that FUT kills hair in the donor area due to traction alopecia.
Thanks doctor Cole. Dr. Bicer persuaded me to go with FUE in the end and I am 100% sure that was the right decision.
 
S

Salazar

member
It's hard to imagine that 18 years later we are still dealing with surgeons promoting FUT
I keep my hair pretty short, so when it comes to surgery, I have only ever considered FUE. However, I found a video by Dr Feller, in which he advises potential patients to avoid FUE. (I am unable to post links here, but the video is on YouTube under the title "The Truth about FUE hair transplants. It's not pretty. - Dr. Feller and Dr. Bloxham.") As such, I am somewhat at a loss as what to think. Is there any way of resolving the argument? Thanks.
 

Philw

member
Hi mate
Had 2 fut strip both stretched and had my 2nd and 3rd with dr feller both strip
My opinion fue is best route to go down cos if it goes wrong ie poor growth or ur not happy least u can shaved hair short and not have a smiley strip scar at back of your head
Yes u get scars from fue but if fue is performed correctly nobody will notice it at all it just looks lije ur hair is slightly thinner at back
 
S

SimBa

Member
Hi mate
Had 2 fut strip both stretched and had my 2nd and 3rd with dr feller both strip
My opinion fue is best route to go down cos if it goes wrong ie poor growth or ur not happy least u can shaved hair short and not have a smiley strip scar at back of your head
Yes u get scars from fue but if fue is performed correctly nobody will notice it at all it just looks lije ur hair is slightly thinner at back
Here's my pics of 2 strip scars
Hey bud, it only becomes visible when your hair at the back is buzzed and graduated in pic 2. The other picture I wouldn't say is noticeable
 
M

MPBsucks1234

Valued member
I am coming up 1 year 2,200 FUE with Farjo and results for me are fantastic. I have had two previously With Feriduni and must say Farjo is on part with him, a world class surgeon.
 
S

Salazar

member
Had 2 fut strip both stretched and had my 2nd and 3rd with dr feller both strip
Thanks, Philw. I'm sorry that it didn't work out for you. I wonder why Dr Feller is such a strong advocate of FUT, given the problems that you & others have described. Anyway, thanks for uploading the pics.
 
S

Salazar

member
must say Farjo is on part with him, a world class surgeon
I've noticed a lot of praise on these forums for Dr Bessam Farjo. However, on his clinic website, there are 3 additional surgeons listed: Dr Nilofer Farjo, Dr Greg Williams, & Dr Rachael Kay. Does anybody have any experience with any of these surgeons? I've yet to find anything.
 
NZK Medical

NZK Medical

Valued member
Cos its much easier to do
He cuts a strip sews u back up then the techs do most of the work

Hi @Philw, I have to take up your point about FUT being much easier. I appreciate you had FUT, but to take your experience out of the equation for a moment. FUT holds more steps and requires some different skills to FUE. In some ways, it is unfair to compare. They each have pros and cons. For the sake of it, if we take as read that both techniques are being performed to a high standard.

FUT is a more surgically orientated procedure to perform. The measurement of the strip is taking into consideration the number of grafts required against the skin laxity and natural characteristics of the skin to heal. As a result, some may be better to take a longer but thinner width. A skilled Dr can extend the strip length and width to maximise the graft numbers and still allow for a clean closure.

While the strip is being removed. Every precaution is taken to minimise the transaction of the hair units around the perimeter of the strip. This can mean carefully cutting around some outlying hair units while trying to maintain a defined edge. The depth is also an important consideration. Too deep going into the fatty tissue and potentially causing issues with the closure and long-term healing. Because of this, it takes time to release the tissue. It´s not simply cut a line and off, or should not be anyway. Closure methods can vary. It´s not a simple task to neatly and with precision close the wound. Often an inner suture helps release much of the pressure on the outer. Taking into consideration the tightness of the tissue under the skin compared to the surface. With neat, tight, and parallel suturing, again takes time. This can be helped or hampered by the natural skin properties.

You are correct, technicians do play an important role in FUT. FUE the units are already divided and still need checking and cleaning. But FUT the hair units have to be separated from the main strip. Under magnification, it can be slow and needs very good hand-eye coordination from the techs. Slithering each unit, and cleaning them ready to be placed. Every care not to cut or damage the units. They get handled a great deal, transection could be an issue if this area of the procedure is not performed to a very high standard. It is often a slow aspect of the procedure while they are being readied. Often the dr oversees as they want to check how much tissue is being left on the graft. This is important as it has to work with the Dr's recipient sites. Some may prefer very lean grafts while others are more "chunky". As a result, the techs need to work as a good team, with each understanding of the process. It all has to move efficiently along to maintain the well-being of the patient and the graft survival for the result. But, I would not say easier, for sure different, with some different demands to FUE.
 
M

MPBsucks1234

Valued member
When Dr B Farjo performs surgery you are in a lot of cases getting Dr Nilofer as well. In my case she performed the extractions. I don’t think she is the lead surgeon in most cases with that being Dr B Farjo. Dr Greg Williams operates in their London surgery. I have seen a couple of posters on other forums with results from Dr Kay and Williams but not as much as Dr FArgos.
 
Top