J
Jason B
member
they said maybe 3500 at a pushHe's sorted it thanks ;-)
I've also had a look at your pics. Yes I can see why they have recommended two visits; I think the max they can do in the UK per visit is 3,000 Grafts.
they said maybe 3500 at a pushHe's sorted it thanks ;-)
I've also had a look at your pics. Yes I can see why they have recommended two visits; I think the max they can do in the UK per visit is 3,000 Grafts.
was hoping to find someone that will complete in one session so don't have to go through it twice any suggestionsthey said maybe 3500 at a push
was hoping to find someone that will complete in one session so don't have to go through it twice any suggestions
Thank you for this reply that’s interesting. If anyone else can provide recommendations and possibly answer the questions about DHI results that would help as well.Jonathon
To go one step forward you need to go 2 steps back.
It appears the density is too low around your hairline for you to get an adequate result. This is based on your post op photos And what your photos indicate now.
You need to wait another 6months to get your final result before you can consider getting the transplant repaired. (When i say repaired this is to get additional grafts to get the result you should have been provided with. Some clinics are doing poor design/low graft survival rate and referring to repairs as top ups. ).
Hopefully some more experienced posters on this forum will give you some advice.
One thing worth considering if the hairline remains sparse is to have a higher hairline (say 0.6-1cm) higher and have those grafts in that area moved back to form a new hairline. This needs to be considered if you have a low number of donor grafts available. This is only worse case and you would need to have an in person consultation with some top clinics for constructive advice on what to do next.
Cost is always a factor, there are some top Belgium clinics whom are reasonably priced and although the top UK clinics are around £4-5 a graft they have produced good documented results for many years.
It is certainly not game over your hairline will thicken in the next 4-6 months, it just means that at some stage you will need a 2nd HT to get a desirable result. Hair concealer and careful styling will disguise the hairline for now and give you the density to get a good look.
Good luck
(I have not had a HT, but have been fortunate to maintain my hair for over 20 years with Finasteride. So my opinion is based solely on my own research/knowledge gained through self education and not as a hair transplant patient)
I think you're looking at Turkey for that option.
As for which clinic - as others have said, it's a bit of a minefield. But this chap had quite a few grafts; he even details the clinic where he had it done:






Given my situation at 6 months, and earlier observations about density, i think it may be time to plan what i can do to improve the density:
I know that full growth is not expected until after 12 months, but at this stage it seems clear that this isn't going to fill as much as it should.
Can anyone please help me by answering the following questions?
- Can maximum density be achieved using a DHI to insert grafts, or is that not necessary?
- Is shedding of implanted hairs less likely with a DHI?
- Is recovery, or hair growth expected to be quicker when implanted with DHI ?
- When adding grafts to increase density, is recovery time expected to be as long as when adding hairline where there are no existing hairs, or is that not relevant?
- Unfortunately budget is an important consideration for me, and with that in mind, can anyone recommend a good place to go for this?
- I am open to travel to Turkey, but I am based in London.
Thanks for this, I will continue to post pictures to show progress - and fingers crossed, hopefully it will look reasonably acceptable without further work. I would be very reluctant to do that, so it would have to be awful. I've always liked wearing hats - so there's always that.
I'm currently approaching 10 months post FUE. Though, my results are okay, definite improvement, I would not recommend the HGC Maida Vale Clinic. If i could turn back time I would opt for Dr Vishal in HGC Romford or a better clinic all together.what was your opinion of HGC. I have been looking at them myself
Thank you very much for writing in detail to address my questions and situation. I will respond fully in due course. First I have a six month follow up to attend very soon. I’m not sure how to go about it, what to ask, what I expect from them, or whether it’s even worth going.What you have to take into account is your hair loss may still be progressing. Even with Finasteride, it might continue.
1. Density can be achieved with the DHI method, an implanter pen or forcep placing. The method is only as good as the person doing it.
2. No, your physiology will decide if grafts shed. It’s possible that certain holding solutions and treatments may enhance or encourage grafts not to shed.
3. No, it depends on the skill of the person and your physiology.
4. It should be similar but sometimes scar tissue in the area may hinder growth. Blood supply could be a factor as well.
5. I don’t recommend but maybe patients who’ve had surgery with a particular clinic will chip in.
6. Cosmedica and Dr Bicer both offer good value. Dr Bicer performs the surgery on one patient per day. Cosmedica have options to have surgery with Dr Acar or a tech lead team. The tech team will be cheaper but you’d need to ask to see results specifically by them and ask about their credentials.
Thank you very much for writing in detail to address my questions and situation. I will respond fully in due course. First I have a six month follow up to attend very soon. I’m not sure how to go about it, what to ask, what I expect from them, or whether it’s even worth going.
At what stage do you think is the soonest I can get a second FUE to improve this?
And is it a far more complex procedure because they will have to work on the low density I have, or is a ‘top up’ of density something standard to have done?
You said that you don’t recommend but then mention Dr Bicer and Cosmedica. Is that a recommendation?
BicmacJonathan, I’ve been following your updates and was hoping your result would turn out reasonable but even though you’re only at 6 months I don’t think it will improve enough past this point to be a satisfactory result that you’re happy with.
Coopman has provided you with a very good opinion which makes a lot of sense. Your hairline contains multi grafts right at the front, the density appears low. Removing the lower rows could be a better solution than adding more grafts to the area.
I may have missed it but what’s your age and over what timeframes did your hair loss begin?
I`m adding some of your images below which I’ll comment on.
View attachment 29548View attachment 29549View attachment 29550View attachment 29551View attachment 29553View attachment 29552
Picture 1, before surgery. I can’t quite make out if your hair was thinning a long the left hand side going back towards the crown or this is just how your hair is styled with a parting. In picture 3 I can’t see that the hair is any thinner along your parting. If this is the case, why did they place grafts there as seen in picture 3?
Picture 3, hairline design. I would have kept your hairline where it was or lowered it by a few millimetres to enable some fine soft single hairs to create a natural look. This would have saved donor as well.
Picture 4, the density looks way less than it should be. If every scab is a graft with no grafts between them, then I don’t think you received 2000 grafts. I could be mistaken though but this would explain the lack of density to date and the graft density that have grown look similar to the picture 4.
Picture 5, you`re at 6 months. There is still time to see more growth but your hair loss looks slightly worse than your pre op picture 1. This could be due to shock loss or continued hair loss.
Picture 6, I don’t see enough improvement happening when comparing to the immediate post op picture 4.
This should have been a fairly straight forward procedure but now it looks as though you will need a further surgery to repair.
My earlier posts on this thread I tried to be encouraging as I don`t want to see patients stressing out but rather than give you false hope I feel it’s better that you face reality and use the next 6 months to research repair options for what I believe will be a sub par result.
This post is to summarise the 6 month post op follow up appointment.
I went in to the appointment with the intention of listening to everything the Dr has to say, and not to tell him what I thought, at least not until the end of the appointment.
When the Dr first saw the progress of my hair growth his instant reaction was to tell me that the growth looks poor, and he was surprised that it did not look better after 6.5 months.
He did not try to mask this in any way, or to be positive about it, either to make me feel better, or to dismiss any complaint he may have anticipated I would make.
He asked if had experienced any recent shedding of hairs (I had not). He also asked if any scabs had remained longer than expected (they had not). He asked about my diet, medication, supplements etc.
We reviewed a lot of the post op photographs, and also the subsequent photographs of which there are millions. He is adamant that the results I am seeing do not reflect the number of grafts the he implanted. He insists that around 2300 grafts were implanted. He seemed to genuinely believe this, and did not accept the notion that the density implanted was inadequate.
I know that you, and others on this group have expressed from early on that the density is low - but I am reporting exactly what the Dr said. I questioned him a number of times. He explained why the density in the pictures looks normal, and over packing grafts in a small area can cause poor growth. I took very detailed notes of exactly what he said, but suffice to say that he is confident in the number of grafts. However, he believes that the low density now is potentially a result of low graft survival.
He proposes to wait longer and has booked me into a further review at 9 months. This is to wait and see in case growth is slow, and continues as this can sometimes happen late on. Therefore, it is still possible that results will significantly improve.
However, if I am not happy with the results, he says that they hope to guarantee results, and would carry out a further session to focus just on the hairline and add the density.
Regarding the few double hair grafts in the hairline, this is unfortunate and they should not be there. The Dr says that it may leave a scar to remove those. There only seem to be a couple, and a fuller hairline may make those less noticeable.
At this stage, I am keeping all options open, including doing nothing in the hope that growth will still appear.
If HGC is willing to help, I would have to consider having a second procedure with them rather than forking out a load more money. However, I would hope that they would allow me to have this done under another surgeon, perhaps in the Romford branch, which from what I have seen, has achieved some very good results on others that have contributed on this forum.
I would like to know how many more grafts might be needed to make my hairline look acceptable.
I will ask about the graft placement, request the pictures and take those measurements and then post again.Ask how many were placed in the crown, the side area and then the hairline.
It would be good if they send you your immediate post op pictures they have. This should provide a better understanding of how many grafts were placed in your hairline.
Measurement-wise, you could use a piece of string. Then measure from your existing hairline to the edge of the transplanted hairline to see how far they lowered it. They should be able to advise you of this too.
This Hairline education video by Dr Bisanga explains density.
